Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 246B. SEX OFFENDER PROGRAM
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 246B.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 246C.13]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Emily Johnson Piper, 845 F.3d 394 (8th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Emily Johnson Piper, 845 F.3d 394 (8th Cir. 2017). “” Minn. Stat. Ann. § 246B.02. MSOP maintains three main facilities to treat persons committed under MCTA.”
Karsjens v. Jesson, 109 F. Supp. 3d 1139 (D. Minnesota 2015). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 246B.02. 24. Following the enactment of the MCTA in 1994, several civilly committed individuals under the newly-enacted legislation challenged the statute’s constitutionality.”
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp, 895 N.W.2d 647 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 246B.02 (2016). The executive director of MSOP is the person charged with the overall responsibility for the operation of MSOP.”
Eugene C. Banks v. Dakota Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. “Services” may include “specialized programs at secure treatment facilities .”
Daywitt v. Harpestead (D. Minnesota 2022). · cites it 2× “¶ 3 ; see also Minn. Stat. § 246B.02; Minn. Stat. § 253B.”
Daywitt v. Harpstead (D. Minnesota 2022). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. §§ 246B.02, 253D.02, subdivs.”
Karsjens v. McCauley (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. Thus, the Court must construe Karsjens’s official-capacity claims against Defendants as being alleged against the State of Minnesota.”
Larson v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs. (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.02; Sorenson v. Minnesota, No.”
Meranelli v. Pruette (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. MSOP maintains a secure treatment facility in Moose Lake, Minnesota.”
Pyron v. Johnston (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. The populations of DOC and MSOP facilities are not similar.”
Navratil (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. The Court has described the procedures related to the MSOP program that are relevant to this case at length in cases concerning similar claims and therefore will not do so again here.”
Hince v. O'KEEFE, 613 N.W.2d 784 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “7, § 28 (codified at Minn.Stat. § 246B.02 (1998)). MSOP provides care and treatment in this facility for 100 individuals civilly committed as SPPs and SDPs.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.