Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 246B.02 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 246C.13]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Emily Johnson Piper, 845 F.3d 394 (8th Cir. 2017).
Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Emily Johnson Piper, 845 F.3d 394 (8th Cir. 2017). “” Minn. Stat. Ann. § 246B.02. MSOP maintains three main facilities to treat persons committed under MCTA.”
Karsjens v. Jesson, 109 F. Supp. 3d 1139 (D. Minn. 2015). “” Minn.Stat. § 246B.02. 24. Following the enactment of the MCTA in 1994, several civilly committed individuals under the newly-enacted legislation challenged the statute’s constitutionality.”
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp, 895 N.W.2d 647 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). “Minn. Stat. § 246B.02 (2016). The executive director of MSOP is the person charged with the overall responsibility for the operation of MSOP.”
Eugene C. Banks v. Dakota Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, No. a221818 (Minn. Ct. App. Nov. 27, 2023). “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. “Services” may include “specialized programs at secure treatment facilities .”
Daywitt v. Harpestead, No. 0:21-cv-01218 (D. Minn. Mar. 24, 2022). “¶ 3 ; see also Minn. Stat. § 246B.02; Minn. Stat. § 253B.”
Daywitt v. Harpstead, No. 0:21-cv-01848 (D. Minn. June 30, 2022). “Minn. Stat. §§ 246B.02, 253D.02, subdivs.”
Karsjens v. McCauley, No. 0:15-cv-02590 (D. Minn. Aug. 23, 2023). “See Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. Thus, the Court must construe Karsjens’s official-capacity claims against Defendants as being alleged against the State of Minnesota.”
Larson v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., No. 0:23-cv-01823 (D. Minn. Sept. 30, 2024). “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.02; Sorenson v. Minnesota, No.”
Meranelli v. Pruette, No. 0:23-cv-02260 (D. Minn. Mar. 25, 2025). “” Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. MSOP maintains a secure treatment facility in Moose Lake, Minnesota.”
Pyron v. Johnston, No. 0:24-cv-04051 (D. Minn. July 25, 2025). “See Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. The populations of DOC and MSOP facilities are not similar.”
Navratil, No. 0:25-cv-01175 (D. Minn. Oct. 31, 2025). “See Minn. Stat. § 246B.02. The Court has described the procedures related to the MSOP program that are relevant to this case at length in cases concerning similar claims and therefore will not do so again here.”
Hince v. O'KEEFE, 613 N.W.2d 784 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). “7, § 28 (codified at Minn.Stat. § 246B.02 (1998)). MSOP provides care and treatment in this facility for 100 individuals civilly committed as SPPs and SDPs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.