Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 3.08 (2026)

Election; Duties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to the duties prescribed by law, the officers and employees shall perform the services required of them by rule or vote of the appointing body or by direction of a committee of the appointing body.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1956–2008 · leading case: Lee v. Fresenius Med. Care, Inc., 741 N.W.2d 117 (Minn. 2007).
Lee v. Fresenius Med. Care, Inc., 741 N.W.2d 117 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 8× “1990) (concluding that because the employee handbook had no provision on the subject, the issue of whether the employee had actually earned the commissions was a question of fact inappropriate for resolution on a summary judgment motion).”
Tynan v. Kstp, Inc., 77 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 24× “(b) of section 3.08, Article III, to entitle employees to pro rata vacation pay on leaving “tbe employ of tbe Company either by lay-off or resignation.”
Koppinger v. City of Fairmont, 248 N.W.2d 708 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “That this ordinance shall be in force and take effect thirty (30) days from and after its passage and publication or posting in accordance with Section 3.08 of the Charter of the City of Fairmont.”
Waste Recovery Coop. of Minnesota v. Cnty. of Hennepin, 475 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “01 provides: All Designated Waste generated within the County, including loads that contain Designated Waste with Undesignatable Waste or Problem Materials, shall be delivered to a Designated Facility and to the final destination point as directed by the County, except as…”
Humenansky v. Minnesota Bd. of Med. Examiners, 525 N.W.2d 559 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “4495b, § 3.08(16) (West 1994); Utah Code Ann. § 58-12-35 (3)(b) (1994); Vt.”
Spectralytics, Inc. v. Cordis Corp., 576 F. Supp. 2d 1030 (D. Minnesota 2008). “Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 3.08 (2008) (“A general rule in patent law is that the date of invention of the applicant or patentee for purposes of novelty and anticipation is presumed to be the date he files a complete patent application in the Patent and Trademark Office…”
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington, 128 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. 1964). “” § 3.08. “Every ordinance or resolution passed by the council shall be signed by the mayor or by the acting mayor, attested by the secre *88 tary of the council and filed and preserved by him.”
— Minn. Stat. § 3.08(16) — 1 case
Humenansky v. Minnesota Bd. of Med. Examiners, 525 N.W.2d 559 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “4495b, § 3.08(16) (West 1994); Utah Code Ann. § 58-12-35 (3)(b) (1994); Vt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.