Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 301.47 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1981 c 270 s 142]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1950–1995 · leading case: Cooper v. Lakewood Eng'g & Mfg. Co., 874 F. Supp. 947 (D. Minnesota 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cooper v. Lakewood Eng'g & Mfg. Co., 874 F. Supp. 947 (D. Minnesota 1994). · cites it 4× “On October 6, 1975, Grainger, as the sole stockholder of MMC, and MMC, executed an Agreement and Plan of Liquidation (“Plan”) to institute voluntary dissolution proceedings for MMC under the Minnesota Business Corporations Act (“MBCA”), Minn.Stat. § 301.47. 5 As a part of the…”

Mississippi Valley Dev. Corp. v. Colonial Enter., Inc., 217 N.W.2d 760 (Minn. 1974). “” While it has been held that formal termination of corporate existence does not occur until the § 301.56 certificate is filed, the corporation is treated differently, for purposes of service of process, once voluntary proceedings for dissolution under § 301.”

In Re Dissolution of E. C. Warner Co., 45 N.W.2d 388 (Minn. 1950). “Appellants raise the question as to whether a liquidating receiver appointed pursuant to § 301.47 has the duty of contesting any and all claims.”

Cooper v. Lakewood Eng'g & Mfg. Co., 45 F.3d 243 (8th Cir. 1995). “Grainger and MMC agreed to voluntary dissolution of MMC under the Minnesota Business Corporations Act, Minn. Stat. § 301.47 (since replaced by Minn.”

Bratnober v. Illinois Farm Supply Co., 169 F. Supp. 85 (D. Minnesota 1958). ““The imperative condition” of equitable intervention is that the moving parties must make it clearly appear that they have a good defense to the action, and by fraud, mistake, or like equitable basis, they were deprived of their day in court, and this only in the absence of…”

Oak Ridge Care Ctr., Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 460 N.W.2d 21 (Minn. 1990). · cites it 2× “The trial court properly concluded that the chapter 301 corporations improperly dissolved because the department’s rate determinations and demands for repayment constitute “debts” or “liabilities” pursuant to Minn.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.