Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 301.52 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1981 c 270 s 142]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1950–1990 · leading case: Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London, 385 N.W.2d 854 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London, 385 N.W.2d 854 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Since one of the duties of the trustee enumerated in § 301.52 is to defend the corporation against claims, it must follow that his capacity as trustee will continue so long as the corporation can be legally subjected to claims.”
In Re Dissolution of E. C. Warner Co., 45 N.W.2d 388 (Minn. 1950). “Pursuant to § 301.52, a receiver is not required to contest all claims.”
Onan Corp. v. Indus. Steel Corp., 770 F. Supp. 490 (D. Minnesota 1989). “The court stated: Since one of the duties of the trustee enumerated in § 301.52 is to defend the corporation against claims, it must follow that his capacity as trustee will continue so long as the corporation can be legally subjected to claims.”
Henderson v. Nw. Heating Engineers, Inc., 144 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. 1966). “ized to receive service on behalf of the corporation prior to dissolution could be properly served with process after the dissolution had been made complete and ruled that a former agent whose connections with and responsibilities to a corporation have been severed does not…”
Kopio's, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 79 N.W.2d 921 (Minn. 1956). “) 19 It is also to be noted that under § 301.52 the trustee is given the power to defend actions, which would seem to carry with it, by implication, the authority to receive process.”
Oak Ridge Care Ctr., Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 452 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “Minn.Stat. § 301.52 (1982). Corporate existence terminates when a certificate of dissolution is filed with the secretary of state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.