Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 302A. BUSINESS CORPORATIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 302A.001 (2026)

Citation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the "Minnesota Business Corporation Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 802 N.W.2d 363 (Minn. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 802 N.W.2d 363 (Minn. 2011). · cites it 2× “(citing Advisory Task Force on Corporation Law, Report to the Senate (1981), reprinted in Minn.Stat. Ann. § 302A.001 (West Supp.2000)).”
Gunderson v. All. of Comput. Professionals, Inc., 628 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “See Report to the Senate by Advisory Task Force on Corporation Law (1981) [Advisory Task Force Report], reprinted in Minn.Stat. Ann. § 302A.001 (West Supp.2000) (noting that the Minnesota Business Corporations Act’s provisions applicable to closely held corporations are…”
Lund v. Lund, 924 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “The 2014 versions of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act (MBCA), Minn. Stat. §§ 302A.001 -.92 (2014), and the Minnesota Limited Liability Company Act (MLLCA), Minn.”
Berreman v. West Publ'g Co., 615 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “” Report to the Senate by Advisory Task Force on Corporation Law (1981) (Advisory Task Force Report), reprinted in Minn. Stat. Ann. § 302A.001 (West Supp.2000).”
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 788 N.W.2d 160 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “See Report to the Senate by Advisory Task Force on Corporation law (1981) [Advisory Task Force Report], reprinted in Minn.Stat. Ann. § 302A.001 (West supp. 2000) (noting that the Minnesota Business Corporations Act's provisions applicable to closely held corporations are…”
Cooper v. Lakewood Eng'g & Mfg. Co., 874 F. Supp. 947 (D. Minnesota 1994). · cites it 2× “270, § 142, codified at Minn.Stat. §§ 302A.001 to .917 (1992). 6 .”
Stacy Demskie v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 7 N.W.3d 382 (Minn. 2024). · cites it 2× “Bank for breach of fiduciary duty and unfairly prejudicial conduct under the Minnesota Business Corporation Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 302A.001–.92 (2022), seeking damages and a buy-out of their interests in RTI.”
Helm Fin. Corp. v. MNVA R.R., Inc. (8th Cir. 2000). “Appellant's claim, however, was not brought under the Minnesota Business Corporation Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 302A.001- .917. The Appellant instead specifically relies on Minnesota common law for its claim, and on this appeal it raises one issue: Whether the Woods, serving as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.