Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 323.01 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1997 c 174 art 12 s 68; 1998 c 262 s 12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1949–2003 · leading case: Maus v. Galic, 669 N.W.2d 38 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
Maus v. Galic, 669 N.W.2d 38 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “The Minnesota Uniform Partnership Act (UPA), Minn.Stat. §§ 323.01-,47 (2000), was repealed and replaced by the Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 (the 1994 UPA), Minn.”
Stacker & Ravich v. Simon, 411 N.W.2d 217 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “SR-2 seeks to apply the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA), Minn.Stat. § 323.01 (1984) to reach the conclusion that Simon was entitled to either 10.”
In Re Flight Transp. Corp. Sec. Litig., 669 F. Supp. 284 (D. Minnesota 1985). “The Uniform Partnership Act, adopted by Minnesota, Minn.Stat. §§ 323.01 et seq. defines a partnership as “as association of two or more persons to carry on as coown-ers a business for profit.”
Wallner v. Schmitz, 57 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. 1953). “§§ 323.01 to 323.43; Pederson v. Pederson, 229 Minn.”
Pederson v. Pederson, 39 N.W.2d 893 (Minn. 1949). “13; but, as to the rights and duties of the partners inter sese, the uniform partnership law treats the partnership as individuals dealing with each other, §§ 323.01 to 323.43. As said in the Rasmussen case ( 148 Neb.”
Comm'r, 2005 T.C. Memo. 103 (1970). “KPLP On March 26, 1994, KPLP was formed under the Minnesota Limited Partnership Act with the help of the estate attorney who had been involved in the formation of the living trust.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.