Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 462.445 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1986 [Repealed, 1987 c 291 s 244]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1951–2011 · leading case: Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. of St. Paul v. Greenman, 96 N.W.2d 673 (Minn. 1959).
Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. of St. Paul v. Greenman, 96 N.W.2d 673 (Minn. 1959). “An examination of the record shows that on May 7, 1956, the housing authority filed its petition for condemnation and for an order appointing commissioners and at the same time filed its application to determine the amounts to be deposited to secure compensation pursuant to §…”
Cedar-Riverside Assocs., Inc. v. United States, 459 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Minn. 1978). “§ 462.445 , subd. 4(2) (1976). In their amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that these two defendants were acting as agents of the federal government in exercising powers granted by the Housing Act.”
Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. v. Coleman's Serv., Inc., 160 N.W.2d 266 (Minn. 1968). “Section 462.445, subd. 1(6), provides that a housing and redevelopment authority can acquire property by the exercise of the eminent domain power if it adopts a resolution “that the acquisition of the real property is necessary to eliminate one or more of the conditions found to…”
City of East Bethel v. Anoka Cnty. Hous. & Redevelopment Auth., 798 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “Minn.Stat. § 462.445, subd. 5 (1971). In 1990 this section was amended to add the following provision: “A city, county or multicounty [HRA] may by resolution authorize another [HRA] to exercise its powers within the authorizing [HRA’s] area of operation at the same time that the…”
Thomas v. Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. of Duluth, 48 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. 1951). “Since the legislature has given these powers to the Authority, it cannot be said that the city unlawfully has delegated its legislative powers by agreeing to accept dedication of streets, sewers, etc.”
Schultz v. Ruiz, 161 N.W.2d 537 (Minn. 1968). “Included specifically (§ 462.445) is the power of eminent domain, to sue and be sued, to have perpetual succession, to make rules and regulations, to borrow money, issue bonds, notes, or.”
Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. v. Minneapolis Metro. Co., 141 N.W.2d 130 (Minn. 1966). “It reads: “* * * An award of compensation shall not be increased by reason of any increase in the value of the real property caused by the assembly, clearance or reconstruction, or proposed assembly, clearance or reconstruction for the purposes of this act of the real property…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.