Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 5.01 (2026)

Custodian Of Records And State Seal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The secretary of state shall be the custodian of the state seal and of all records and documents of the state not expressly required by law to be kept by other state officials.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases, 1959–2016 · leading case: United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological Bd., 307 N.W.2d 490 (Minn. 1981).
United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological Bd., 307 N.W.2d 490 (Minn. 1981). “This argument is based on sections 5.01 and 5.03 of the installment contract, quoted earlier in this opinion.”
McKee v. Likins, 261 N.W.2d 566 (Minn. 1977). “254 to 262; 1 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 5.01, et seq.; Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies, pp.”
Newmech Companies v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 206, 540 N.W.2d 801 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 2× “[2] Resolution for the sale of General Obligation School Building Bonds, Series 1992A, § 5.01, Minutes of Independent School District No.”
Larson v. Dunn, 449 N.W.2d 751 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Karp, Domestic Torts: Family Violence, Conflicts & Sexual Abuse, § 5.01 (1989). Often the parent who abducts the child is aided by friends and family.”
Minnesota Higher Educ. Facilities Auth. v. Hawk, 232 N.W.2d 106 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 2× “01) providing in part that the institution “will use and operate the Project at all times as ah educational facility, eligible to be and defined as a ‘project’ under the Act, and not as a facility for sectarian instruction or as a place of religious worship nor primarily in…”
Nw. Nat'l Life Ins. v. Metro Square (In Re Metro Square), 93 B.R. 990 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1988). “Broude, Reorganizations Under Chapter 11 of The Bankruptcy Code, § 5.01[3], at 11-12 (1986). 3 . One court in particular pointed out the flaw in the analysis of the majority view: A few courts have divined from this language [in section 546(b) ] a relevance to the present…”
Nordmarken v. City of Richfield, 641 N.W.2d 343 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “Charter commissions have express statutory authority to frame charters to allow for referendum by the voters to repeal ordinances. Minn.Stat. § 410.20 (2000).”
Shumway v. Nelson, 107 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1961). “2 See cases collected in 4 Personal Injury, Actions-Defenses-Damages, Husband and Wife, § 5.01, note 1; Annotation, 43 A. L. R. (2d) 632.”
Port Auth. of St. Paul v. Harstad, 531 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “” Thus, reading lease §§ 5.01 and 4.05 together: If Har-stads assigned their interest in the lease to another entity, Harstads were no longer primarily liable on the lease but they were still liable if the transferee defaulted.”
Mastr Asset Backed Sec. Trust 2006-He3 ex rel. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. WMC Mortg., LLC, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (D. Minnesota 2013). · cites it 2× “(EquiFirst Purchase Agreement § 5.01.) Procedural History The Trastee contends that the mortgages WMC and EquiFirst sold to the trusts violated their respective representations *1110 and warranties, including the representation and warranty that the loans complied with certain…”
State v. Bird, 285 N.W.2d 481 (Minn. 1979). “In recent years many courts, commentators, and the drafters of the Model Penal Code (see § 5.01) have either criticized or rejected the defense of legal impossibility, and thus it is not surprising that when the Minnesota Criminal Code was revised the drafters decided to…”
Sorin Grp. USA, Inc. v. St. Jude Med., S.C., Inc., 176 F. Supp. 3d 814 (D. Minnesota 2016). “A § 5.01(d), Oct. 5, 2015, Docket No. 120.) In January 2014, Homan accepted a position as Director of Regional Sales, Structural Heart, with St.”
— Minn. Stat. § 5.01(d) — 1 case
Sorin Grp. USA, Inc. v. St. Jude Med., S.C., Inc., 176 F. Supp. 3d 814 (D. Minnesota 2016). “A § 5.01(d), Oct. 5, 2015, Docket No. 120.) In January 2014, Homan accepted a position as Director of Regional Sales, Structural Heart, with St.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.