Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 5.21 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1980 c 615 s 61]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2022 · leading case: Brooks Inv. Co. v. City of Bloomington, 232 N.W.2d 911 (Minn. 1975).
Brooks Inv. Co. v. City of Bloomington, 232 N.W.2d 911 (Minn. 1975). “) *314 Thus, both parties argue that the crucial question is: When is the time of taking? Both parties ignore § 5.21, where we find the following statement: “If a parcel of land is sold after a portion of it has been taken (or after it has been injuriously affected by the…”
Ness v. City of Bloomington, No. 0:19-cv-02882 (D. Minn. July 23, 2020). “City Ordinance On October 28, 2019, the City of Bloomington’s City Council approved several revisions to City Ordinance § 5.21, including the addition of subdivision 24, which states: (24) No person shall intentionally take a photograph or otherwise record a child without the…”
Ness v. City of Bloomington, 437 F. Supp. 3d 714 (D. Minn. 2020). “Roepke”) (collectively, “City Defendants”) from enforcing Ordinance § 5.21 of the City of Bloomington Code (“City Ordinance”).”
Ness v. City of Bloomington, No. 0:19-cv-02882 (D. Minn. Sept. 30, 2021). “The Motion is granted as to all claims except the claim that Section 5.21(23) of Bloomington’s City Code is unconstitutional as applied to Ness’s photography and video recording of matters relating to a public controversy at Smith Park; and 3.”
Ness v. City of Bloomington, No. 0:19-cv-02882 (D. Minn. Apr. 7, 2022). “City Code § 5.21(23). A violation of the ordinance is punished as a petty misdemeanor.”
Minn. Stat. § 5.21(23): 2 cases
Ness v. City of Bloomington, No. 0:19-cv-02882 (D. Minn. Sept. 30, 2021). “The Motion is granted as to all claims except the claim that Section 5.21(23) of Bloomington’s City Code is unconstitutional as applied to Ness’s photography and video recording of matters relating to a public controversy at Smith Park; and 3.”
Ness v. City of Bloomington, No. 0:19-cv-02882 (D. Minn. Apr. 7, 2022). “City Code § 5.21(23). A violation of the ordinance is punished as a petty misdemeanor.”
Minn. Stat. § 5.21(24): 1 case
Ness v. City of Bloomington, No. 0:19-cv-02882 (D. Minn. July 23, 2020). “City Ordinance On October 28, 2019, the City of Bloomington’s City Council approved several revisions to City Ordinance § 5.21, including the addition of subdivision 24, which states: (24) No person shall intentionally take a photograph or otherwise record a child without the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.