Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 501.07 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1989 c 340 art 1 s 77]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1944–1997 · leading case: Freundschuh v. Freundschuh, 559 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Freundschuh v. Freundschuh, 559 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 36× “Does Minn.Stat. § 501.07 (1988) preclude finding a resulting trust in favor of respondent? 2.”

Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. Zacho, 92 N.W.2d 905 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 3× “It seems clear to us that § 501.07 presents no bar to a reformation of the contract if facts can be established giving a right to such reformation.”

Bastian v. Brink, 45 N.W.2d 712 (Minn. 1951). · cites it 3× “In any event, since the enactment of § 501.07 mere payment of purchase price alone would not entitle defendant to the relief granted by the trial court.”

Lund v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 15 N.W.2d 426 (Minn. 1944). “1941, §§ 501.07 and 501.08 (Mason St. 1927, §§ 8086 and 8087).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.