Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 501.11 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1989 c 340 art 1 s 77]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1944–1960 · leading case: Schaeffer v. Newberry, 50 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. 1951).
Schaeffer v. Newberry, 50 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. 1951). “03 at all applicable to charitable trusts authorized under § 501.11 (7). Under the authority of § 165.”
Mareck v. Hoffman, 100 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 1960). “It is the principal contention of the attorney general that the deed executed by McNaught and his wife to the village of Edina in 1929 created a charitable trust under § 501.11 and that the village was without authority to convey this property in the manner in which it was…”
In re Application of Mareck to Register Title, 257 Minn. 222 (1960). “It is the principal contention of the attorney general that the deed executed by McNaught and his wife to the village of Edina in 1929 created a charitable trust under § 501.11 and that the village was without authority to convey this property in the manner in which it was…”
Lund v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 15 N.W.2d 426 (Minn. 1944). “There is no evidence whatsoever of an express trust under § 501.11 (§ 8090). With reference to the charges against the other children shown on the books of the corporation, it is apparent that all of them were entered on the books prior to the death of Anton Lund and the…”
Minn. Stat. § 501.11(7): 1 case
Schaeffer v. Newberry, 50 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. 1951). “03 at all applicable to charitable trusts authorized under § 501.11 (7). Under the authority of § 165.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.