Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 518.23 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1951 c 551 s 15]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1944–1974 · leading case: Warner v. Warner, 17 N.W.2d 58 (Minn. 1944).
Warner v. Warner, 17 N.W.2d 58 (Minn. 1944). “) Section 518.23 (§ 8603) provides: “After an order or decree for alimony, or other allowance for the wife and children, or either of them, or for the appointment of trustees to receive and hold any property for the use of the wife or children, the court, from time to time, on…”
Boiteau v. Boiteau, 33 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. 1948). “* * * We think the language of § 518.23 plainly limits the court’s power to ‘revise and alter’ an order or decree in the matter of alimony to cases where, initially and as a part of the divorce proceeding, ‘alimony, or other allowance’ has been given to the wife.”
Tammen v. Tammen, 182 N.W.2d 840 (Minn. 1970). “We have invariably held that it is within the power of the trial court under § 518.23 *31 to make such modifications respecting alimony or support money subsequent to the entry of judgment in a divorce action as changed conditions and circumstances of the parties may require.”
Eckert v. Eckert, 216 N.W.2d 837 (Minn. 1974). “Our conclusion was as follows: *125 “* * * We think the language of § 518.23 [predecessor to current § 518.64] plainly limits the court’s power to ‘revise and alter’ an order or decree in the matter of alimony to cases where, initially and as a part of the divorce proceeding,…”
Johnson v. Johnson, 130 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. 1964). “1949, § 518.23, superseded by Minn. St. 518.64 referred to hereinafter.”
Anderson v. Anderson, 184 N.W.2d 415 (Minn. 1971). “[2d] 67): “* * * We think the language of § 518.23 [predecessor to current § 518.64 1 ] plainly limits the court’s power to ‘revise and alter’ an order or decree in the matter of alimony to cases where, initially and as a part of the divorce proceeding, ‘alimony, or other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.