Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 518C. UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518C.609 (2026)

Procedure To Register Child Support Order Of Another State For Modification

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A party or support enforcement agency seeking to modify, or to modify and enforce, a child support order issued in another state shall register that order in this state in the same manner provided in sections 518C.601 to 518C.608 if the order has not been registered. A petition for modification may be filed at the same time as a request for registration, or later. The pleading must specify the grounds for modification.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2000–2016 · leading case: In Re the Welfare of S.R.S., 756 N.W.2d 123 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Welfare of S.R.S., 756 N.W.2d 123 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.609. There is a statutory procedure for registering another state's support order in Minnesota for enforcement or modification; that procedure requires obtaining specified documents from the issuing state and filing them in the registering state.”
Stone v. Stone, 636 N.W.2d 594 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.609. The Minnesota court may modify the foreign support order only if it finds, among other things, that the petitioner is a nonresident of Minnesota.”
Marriage of Schroeder v. Schroeder, 658 N.W.2d 909 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Even had mother presented a valid ar-rearages- issue, registration would be barred by Minn.Stat. § 518C.609, which governs the procedure to register a child support order from another state for modification.”
Rivera v. Ramsey Cnty., 615 N.W.2d 854 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 518C.609 (1998) (registration for modification); Minn.”
Gwender Lagrone Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 518C.609 (2014). Mr. Taylor did not present this argument to the district court before the district court issued its December 11, 2015 order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.