Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 518D. UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518D.101 (2026)

Short Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the "Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2001–2024 · leading case: Dwight Mitchell v. Dakota Cnty. Soc. Servs., 959 F.3d 887 (8th Cir. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dwight Mitchell v. Dakota Cnty. Soc. Servs., 959 F.3d 887 (8th Cir. 2020). “See Minn. Stat. § 518D.101 et seq. However, the CHIPS proceeding was an adjudication of Minnesota child protection law, not a child custody dispute requiring deferment to New Jersey courts.”
Stone v. Stone, 636 N.W.2d 594 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. §§ 518D.101 — .317 (2000). 1 The uniform custody laws were established to resolve jurisdictional issues involving interstate child-custody disputes and must be interpreted accordingly.”
Leroy K.D. v. Nicole B., 2021 IL App (3d) 200010 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “(West 2018); Minn. Stat. § 518D.101 et seq. (2018)), which Leroy cites as the applicable child custody statute in this case, Minnesota was not R.”
Gerber v. Eastman, 673 N.W.2d 854 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “The UCCJEA instructs Minnesota courts to “treat a tribe as if it were a state of the United States for the purpose of applying sections 518D.101 to 518D.210,” which deal with interstate child custody determinations or disputes.”
In re the Custody of: S.K.S. Christian Schut v. Cynthia Schut (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “Here, father moved the district court to order immediate compliance with Minn.”
Rodriguez v. Noriega (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2× “and Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), Minn. Stat. § 518D.101 et seq. Pet. ¶¶ 1, 31.”
Rodriguez v. Noriega (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2× “§§ 9001–11, and the Minnesota Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”), Minn. Stat. § 518D.101 et seq. Pet. ¶¶ 1, 31.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.