Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 550.011 (2026)

Judgment Debtor Disclosure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless the parties have otherwise agreed, if a judgment has been docketed in district court for at least 30 days, and the judgment is not satisfied, the judgment creditor's attorney as an officer of the court may or the district court in the county in which the judgment originated shall, upon request of the judgment creditor, order the judgment debtor to mail by certified mail to the judgment creditor information as to the nature, amount, identity, and locations of all the debtor's assets, liabilities, and personal earnings. The information must be provided on a form prescribed by the supreme court, and the information shall be sufficiently detailed to enable the judgment creditor to obtain satisfaction of the judgment by way of execution on nonexempt assets and earnings of the judgment debtor. The order must contain a notice that failure to complete the form and mail it to the judgment creditor within ten days after service of the order may result in a citation for civil contempt of court. Cash bail posted as a result of being cited for civil contempt of court order under this section may be ordered payable to the creditor to satisfy the judgment, either partially or fully, subject to section 588.04, paragraph (b).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2022 · leading case: State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander, 855 N.W.2d 340 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander, 855 N.W.2d 340 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 550.011 (2012). “[T]he information shall be sufficiently detailed to enable the judgment creditor to obtain satisfaction of the judgment by way of execution on nonexempt assets and earnings of the judgment debtor.”
Pederson v. Kesner (D. Minnesota 2022). · cites it 5× “69 and Minn. Stat. § 550.011 . ECF No. 51-1 at 3–12.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.