Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 566.12 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1998 c 253 s 80]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1957–1994 · leading case: Levine v. Hauser, 431 N.W.2d 269 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Levine v. Hauser, 431 N.W.2d 269 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 566.12 (1986) (appeal must be taken from judgment of restitution); Makela v.”

Tonkaway Ltd. P'ship v. McLain, 433 N.W.2d 443 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 566.12 (1986); Makela v. Peters, 425 N.”

The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp., 85 N.W.2d 207 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 2× “Section 566.12, relating to appeals in unlawful detainer cases, states that: “If either party feels aggrieved by the judgment he may appeal within ten days as in other cases triable before justices of the peace # * * 5 27 M.”

Duluth Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. City of Duluth, 520 N.W.2d 775 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 566.12 (1992). Because the district court consolidated the claim for relocation benefits and the unlawful detainer action, the time to appeal did not begin until both actions were adjudicated.”

Berg v. Wiley, 264 N.W.2d 145 (Minn. 1978). “§ 566.12. Upon execution of a writ of restitution, the tenant is allowed 24 hours to vacate the property.”

Makela v. Peters, 425 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 566.12 (1986); Goldberg v. Fields, 247 Minn.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.