Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 593.01 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1990 c 553 s 15]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1969–2002 · leading case: State v. Hamm, 423 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1988).
State v. Hamm, 423 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1988). “However, the motion was denied based on Minn.Stat. § 593.01, subd. 1 (1986), which provides for a six-member jury in misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor cases.”
Alholm v. Wilt, 394 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 1986). “Minn.Stat. § 593.01 (1984); Minn.R. Civil P.”
Young ex rel. Young v. Hansen, 209 N.W.2d 392 (Minn. 1973). “1969, § 593.01, was amended by L. 1971, c. 917, and now provides in part: “Subdivision 1.”
State v. Begbie, 415 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Minn.Stat. § 593.01 (1986). The trial court’s jury instructions did not require the jury to unanimously agree which victim had been terrorized by Begbie.”
Baker v. State, 590 N.W.2d 636 (Minn. 1999). “In 1971, the legislature passed Minn.Stat. § 593.01, subd. 1, providing for six-person juries in all cases except for gross misdemeanor and felony trials.”
State v. Lopez, 390 N.W.2d 306 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Minn. Stat. § 593.01 , subd. 2 (1984) provides that if the offense charged is a gross misdemeanor or a felony, the number of jurors is twelve, 1 “unless the defendant consents to a jury of six.”
State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d 695 (Minn. 1969). “Defendant argues that the jury is “completed” when the twelfth regular member is sworn, citing § 593.01, which defines a petit jury as “a body of 12 men or women, or both,” and § 546.”
State v. Roberts, 651 N.W.2d 198 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “In 1988, our supreme court interpreted Article I, section 6 of the Minnesota Constitution to guarantee a jury of twelve persons in all criminal prosecutions and declared Minn.Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.