Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 593.01 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1990 c 553 s 15]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1969–2002 · leading case: State v. Hamm, 423 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1988).
State v. Hamm, 423 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1988). · cites it 44× “However, the motion was denied based on Minn.Stat. § 593.01, subd. 1 (1986), which provides for a six-member jury in misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor cases.”
Alholm v. Wilt, 394 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 593.01 (1984); Minn.R. Civil P.”
Young ex rel. Young v. Hansen, 209 N.W.2d 392 (Minn. 1973). · cites it 4× “1969, § 593.01, was amended by L. 1971, c. 917, and now provides in part: “Subdivision 1.”
State v. Begbie, 415 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 593.01 (1986). The trial court’s jury instructions did not require the jury to unanimously agree which victim had been terrorized by Begbie.”
Baker v. State, 590 N.W.2d 636 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 2× “In 1971, the legislature passed Minn.Stat. § 593.01, subd. 1, providing for six-person juries in all cases except for gross misdemeanor and felony trials.”
State v. Lopez, 390 N.W.2d 306 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 5× “Minn. Stat. § 593.01 , subd. 2 (1984) provides that if the offense charged is a gross misdemeanor or a felony, the number of jurors is twelve, 1 “unless the defendant consents to a jury of six.”
State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d 695 (Minn. 1969). “Defendant argues that the jury is “completed” when the twelfth regular member is sworn, citing § 593.01, which defines a petit jury as “a body of 12 men or women, or both,” and § 546.”
State v. Roberts, 651 N.W.2d 198 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “In 1988, our supreme court interpreted Article I, section 6 of the Minnesota Constitution to guarantee a jury of twelve persons in all criminal prosecutions and declared Minn.Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.