Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 60.02 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1967 c 395 art 1 s 25]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1943–2015 · leading case: Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 172 N.W.2d 292 (Minn. 1969).
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 172 N.W.2d 292 (Minn. 1969). “4: “ ‘Foreign corporation’ does not include any corporation * * *, under the constitution and statutes of the United States, * * * [or] insurance companies as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 60.02 * * Section 60.02, repealed and reenacted as § 60A.”
Gassler v. State, 787 N.W.2d 575 (Minn. 2010). “We have recognized in the past that our postconviction proceedings are similar in some respects to habeas proceedings.”
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton, 869 N.W.2d 60 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “Haydock, Minnesota Practice, § 60.02 (5th ed.) (“Although motions to vacate judgments and orders 6 under Rule 60.”
Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Ins. Co., 8 N.W.2d 28 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 60.02, subds. 9, 10 (§ 3848), is a bar to Kelly’s employment as a subagent of Schacht, this should be said: That section defines “an ‘insurance agent’ ” as “a person acting under express authority from an insurer”; and “an ‘insurance solicitor’ ” as “a person acting…”
Bonhiver v. Louisiana Brokers Exch. of Baton Rouge, Inc., 255 F. Supp. 254 (D. Minnesota 1966). “1 (1961). Substituted service of process was also made possible with respect to surplus line • insurance by virtue of Minn.”
Isanti Cnty. Fam. Servs. & Welfare Dep't Ex Rel. Edwardh v. Swanson, 394 N.W.2d 180 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “§ 60.02. Appellant received notice of the child support hearing and consulted an attorney.”
Farmers Ins. Grp. v. Comm'r of Taxation, 153 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 1967). “Section 60.02, subd. 4, defines an insurance company as “every corporation, business trust, or association engaged in insurance as prin *172 cipal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.