Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 609.762 (2026)

Forfeiture Of Gambling Devices, Prizes And Proceeds

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Forfeiture.

The following are subject to forfeiture:

(1) devices used or intended for use, including those defined in section 349.30, subdivision 2, as a gambling device, except as authorized in sections 299L.07 and 349.11 to 349.23;

(2) all moneys, materials, and other property used or intended for use as payment to participate in gambling or a prize or receipt for gambling;

(3) books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes, and data used or intended for use in gambling; and

(4) property used or intended to be used to illegally influence the outcome of a horse race.

Subd. 2.Seizure.

Property subject to forfeiture under subdivision 1 may be seized by any law enforcement agency upon process issued by any court having jurisdiction over the property. Seizure without process may be made if:

(1) the seizure is incident to an arrest or a search under a search warrant;

(2) the property subject to seizure has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in a criminal injunction or forfeiture proceeding; or

(3) the law enforcement agency has probable cause to believe that the property was used or is intended to be used in a gambling violation and the delay occasioned by the necessity to obtain process would result in the removal, loss, or destruction of the property.

Subd. 3.Not subject to replevin.

Property taken or detained under subdivision 2 is not subject to a replevin action, but is considered to be in the custody of the law enforcement agency subject only to the orders and decrees of the court having jurisdiction over the forfeiture proceedings.

Subd. 4.Procedures.

Property must be forfeited after a conviction for a gambling violation according to the following procedure:

(1) a separate complaint must be filed against the property describing it, charging its use in the specified violation, and specifying the time and place of its unlawful use;

(2) if the person charged with a gambling offense is acquitted, the court shall dismiss the complaint and order the property returned to the persons legally entitled to it; and

(3) if after conviction the court finds the property, or any part of it, was used in violation as specified in the complaint, it shall order that the property be sold or retained by the law enforcement agency for official use. Proceeds from the sale of forfeited property may be retained for official use and shared equally between the law enforcement agency investigating the offense involved in the forfeiture and the prosecuting agency that prosecuted the offense involved in the forfeiture and handled the forfeiture proceedings.

Subd. 5.Exception.

Property may not be seized or forfeited under this section if the owner shows to the satisfaction of the court that the owner had no notice or knowledge or reason to believe that the property was used or intended to be used in violation of this section.

Subd. 6.Reporting.

The law enforcement and prosecuting agencies shall report on forfeitures occurring under this section as described in section 609.5315, subdivision 6.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1991–2000 · leading case: St. Louis Cnty. Attorney's Off. v. Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Three & 01/100 Dollars ($24,643.01) in Various Denominations of U.S. Currency, 524 N.W.2d 542 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

St. Louis Cnty. Attorney's Off. v. Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Three & 01/100 Dollars ($24,643.01) in Various Denominations of U.S. Currency, 524 N.W.2d 542 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 13× “Minn.Stat. § 609.762 subd. 1(a), (b) (1988).”

State, Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. $6,276 in United States Currency, 478 N.W.2d 333 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 609.762, subd. 1(b) (1990). For the state to prevail in a forfeiture action: (a) a separate complaint must be filed against the property describing it, charging its use in the specified violation, and specifying the time and place of its unlawful use; (b) if the…”

Humphrey v. $1109 in United States Currency, 539 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “In $6,276, this court considered which statute of limitations applied to a gambling forfeiture action under Minn.Stat. § 609.762 (1990). There, as here, the state was the plaintiff, bringing a civil in rem action for forfeiture, under a statute lacking an express limitation…”

Mullins v. Churchill, 616 N.W.2d 764 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “10 with the following forfeiture statutes: Minn.Stat. §§ 609.762, subd. 4, 609.5312, subd.”

State v. Bistodeau, 582 N.W.2d 592 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 15× “Appellant argues that the district court erred when it concluded that it had jurisdiction over money seized from respondent at the time of his arrest (money subject to a possible future forfeiture under Minn.Stat. § 609.762 (1996)). Appellant also argues that the district court…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.