Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 610. CRIMES, GENERAL PROVISIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 610.33 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1961–1970 · leading case: State v. Morrissey, 135 N.W.2d 57 (Minn. 1965).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Morrissey, 135 N.W.2d 57 (Minn. 1965). · cites it 8× “1961, § 610.33, which provided: *125 “* * * [Wjhen a person while under sentence for felony commits another felony, and is sentenced to another term of imprisonment such latter term shall not begin until the expiration of all prior terms.”
State v. Mertz, 130 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 6× “1961, § 610.33, then in effect, which stated in part: "* * * when a person while under sentence for felony commits another felony, and is sentenced to another term of imprisonment such latter term shall not begin until the expiration of all prior terms.”
State v. Azzone, 135 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 1965). “1957, § 610.33 (applicable when the sentence here involved was imposed, but since repealed), see People v.”
State ex rel. Lillemoe v. Tahash, 159 N.W.2d 99 (Minn. 1968). “1961, § 610.33. Section 609.15 of the Criminal Code of 1963 now provides that unless otherwise ordered the term of the sentence imposed shall run concurrently with any prior sentences.”
Clausen v. State, 181 N.W.2d 471 (Minn. 1970). “1957, § 610.33, which was then in effect, the sentences would have run consecutively.”
State ex rel. White v. Tahash, 111 N.W.2d 523 (Minn. 1961). “Consequently, § 610.33 does not apply. Relator has not been denied due process of law and, it appearing affirmatively from the record that the trial court had jurisdiction of the person and subject matter, the writ was properly discharged.”
State ex rel. Beach v. Tahash, 161 N.W.2d 664 (Minn. 1968). “1961, § 610.33. 2 Whether the sentence was harsh, however, is not the issue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.