Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 611A.51 (2026)
Title
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: Bruegger v. Faribault Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 497 N.W.2d 260 (Minn. 1993).
Bruegger v. Faribault Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 497 N.W.2d 260 (Minn. 1993). “The statute in relevant part reads: All law enforcement agencies investigating crimes shall provide forms to each person who may be eligible to file a claim pursuant to sections 611A.51 to 611A.67 and to inform them of their rights hereunder.”
United States v. Robertson, 638 F. Supp. 1202 (E.D. Va. 1986). “§§ 18-351 to 18-368 (West 1981); Minn.Stat. Ann. §§ 611A.51 to 611A.68 (West Supp.”
State of Minnesota v. Almanzo Ousley Cotton, 996 N.W.2d 240 (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). “As relevant here, “collateral source” is defined in 7 the Crime Victims Reparations Act as “a source of benefits or advantages for economic loss otherwise reparable under sections 611A.51 to 611A.68 which the victim or claimant has received, or which is readily available to the…”
Bruegger v. Faribault Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 486 N.W.2d 463 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “In order to encourage claimants, the Act requires the cooperation of law enforcement offices: All law enforcement agencies investigating crimes shall provide forms to each person who may be eligible to file a claim pursuant to sections 611A.51 to 611A.67 and to inform them of…”
State of Minnesota v. Almanzo Ousley Cotton, 13 N.W.3d 412 (Minn. 2024). “arranged for her mother’s cremation and paid $2,362 to a cremation service using her 1 See Minn. Stat. §§ 611A.51–.68 (2022). This law was renamed the “Minnesota Crime Victims Reimbursement Act” in 2023 after the relevant events in this case, but the amendments to the law did…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.