Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 614.11 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1959–1972 · leading case: State v. Cunningham, 99 N.W.2d 908 (Minn. 1959).
State v. Cunningham, 99 N.W.2d 908 (Minn. 1959). “The sole question presented for review is whether the drawing and passing of a check upon a bank where a defendant has no account constitutes swindling as defined in § 614.11. This issue is one of first impression and, as is subsequently discussed, its determination is of…”
State v. Ruffin, 158 N.W.2d 202 (Minn. 1968). “” In considering defendant’s claim that this statute is unconstitutional as being vague and uncertain, it should be noted that by the Criminal Code adopted in 1963 the legislature effected a unification of various prior statutes pertaining to such crimes as larceny,…”
State v. Wells, 121 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1963). “The pertinent parts of § 614.11, under which this charge was made, provide: “Every person who, by means of * * * any * * * instrument, trick or device, obtains from another person any money or other property of any description, shall be guilty of the crime of swindling, * * *;…”
Application of Herman, 197 N.W.2d 241 (Minn. 1972). “1961, § 614.11, a felony. 1 He now petitions for reinstatement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.