Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 619.15 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1968–1984 · leading case: State v. Crace, 289 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. 1979).
State v. Crace, 289 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. 1979). “2 Hayes demurred to the information, claiming that the phrase “carelessness in mistaking the person shot for a deer or other animal” rendered the statute so vague as to be unconstitutional under the state and federal constitutions.”
State v. Munnell, 344 N.W.2d 883 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “In addition to forming the basis for manslaughter in the first degree under § 619.15(3), it is made sufficient to support conviction for manslaughter in the second degree by virtue of §§ 619.”
State v. Steeves, 157 N.W.2d 67 (Minn. 1968). “1961, § 619.15, in effect at the time of the crime, provided that a homicide is “manslaughter in the first degree when committed without a design to effect death.”
Minn. Stat. § 619.15(3): 2 cases
State v. Crace, 289 N.W.2d 54 (Minn. 1979). “2 Hayes demurred to the information, claiming that the phrase “carelessness in mistaking the person shot for a deer or other animal” rendered the statute so vague as to be unconstitutional under the state and federal constitutions.”
State v. Munnell, 344 N.W.2d 883 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “In addition to forming the basis for manslaughter in the first degree under § 619.15(3), it is made sufficient to support conviction for manslaughter in the second degree by virtue of §§ 619.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.