Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 621.01 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1969–2019 · leading case: State v. Gerou, 168 N.W.2d 15 (Minn. 1969).
State v. Gerou, 168 N.W.2d 15 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 3× “621, the former chapter, enumerating “OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY BY FORCE,” which included the crime of burglary, contained a definition section, § 621.01. Subd. 4 of that section provided: “The word ‘building’ means every house, vessel, raffway car, tent, shop, or other…”
State v. Vredenberg, 264 N.W.2d 406 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 2× “1961, § 621.01, subd. 4, defined “building” as “every house, vessel, railway car, tent, shop, or other structure suitable for affording shelter for human beings, or appurtenant to or connected with a structure so adapted.”
State v. Nelson, 363 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 621.01, subd. 7 (1961) (repealed 1963 Minn.”
State v. Hofmann, 549 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “(citing Minn.Stat. § 621.01, subd. 4 (1961)) (emphasis omitted).”
State v. Schotl, 182 N.W.2d 878 (Minn. 1971). · cites it 2× “1961, § 621.01, subd. 3, defined “dwelling house,” and “dwelling” as used in Minn.”
In re the Welfare of R.O.H., 444 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 621.01, subd. 4 (1961). This definition, with specifically enumerated structures, was abandoned in favor of the more general definition at issue in the cases discussed above.”
Walker v. United States, No. 4:16-cv-00703 (W.D. Mo. June 17, 2019). “”); Minn. Stat. § 621.01 , subd. 4 (1961) (involving a “building” which is defined as “any house, vessel, railway car, tent, shop, or other structure suitable for affording shelter for human beings, or appurtenant to or connected with a structure so adapted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.