Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 624. CRIMES; FIREWORKS; FIREARMS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 624.718 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1985 c 144 s 4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2003–2017 · leading case: State v. Williams, 771 N.W.2d 514 (Minn. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Williams, 771 N.W.2d 514 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 2× “1 (2008); and one count of felon in possession of a firearm in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.718, subd. (2)(b) (2008).”
State v. Grillo, 661 N.W.2d 641 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “713, subd. 1(b) *645 was unconstitutional because disqualification from firearm possession was not a punishment contemplated for commission of auto theft at the time appellant was adjudicated.”
In Re the Welfare of M.D.R., 693 N.W.2d 444 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Appellant was subsequently charged in a delinquency petition with one count of possession of a pistol by an underage person in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.718, subds. 1(a), (2). At his Rasmussen hearing to suppress the weapon, appellant argued that it was seized in violation…”
State v. Watson, 829 N.W.2d 626 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Respondent State of Minnesota charged Watson under Minn.Stat. § 624.718, subd. 1(2), certain persons not to possess firearms, and under MinmStat.”
State v. Theng Yang, 814 N.W.2d 716 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. §§ 624.718, subds. 1(2), 2(b), 609.”
State v. Edstrom, 901 N.W.2d 455 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “2(a)(1) (2014); and possession of a firearm by an ineligible person, in violation of Minn. Stat. § 624.718 , subd. 1(2) (Supp.”
State v. Mayl, 836 N.W.2d 368 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Appellant pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.718, subd. 1(2) (2010), 1 and one count of possession of an electronic incapacitation device by an ineligible person in violation of Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.