Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 626.06 (2026)
Jurisdiction To Issue
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Search warrants may be issued by any court, other than a court exercising probate jurisdiction, having jurisdiction in the area where the place to be searched is located.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1967–2016 · leading case: Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard, 195 L. Ed. 2d 560 (2016).
Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard, 195 L. Ed. 2d 560 (2016). “Minn.Stat. § 626.06 (2009). But the state district court judges appear to do the lion's share of that work.”
State v. Monsrud, 337 N.W.2d 652 (Minn. 1983). “2 (1980); (4) the application did not identify Alroy Monsrud as a person whose conversations were to be intercepted, in violation of 18 U.”
Emerson v. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. 199, 809 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 2012). “12 (2010) (stating that commercial automobile policies "must provide coverage for rented vehicles as required in Chapter 65B" (emphasis added)); Minn. Stat. § 626.06 , subd. 4 (2010) (describing that a health maintenance organization is a number three qualified plan if it…”
State v. Quinn, 436 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 1989). “The legislative concern that the duration of the warrant be limited only to time periods absolutely necessary to accomplish the result sought is evidenced by Minn.Stat. § 626.06, subd. 4(h) and subd.”
State v. Paulick, 151 N.W.2d 591 (Minn. 1967). “§ 626.06. As we noted in the Duhn case, very early in our state history this court speaking through Mr.”
State v. Dyer, 438 N.W.2d 716 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “§ 626.06 (1988) states that “[sjearch warrants may be issued by any court * * * having jurisdiction in the area where the place to be searched is located.”
United States v. Mara Theresa Quinn, United States of Am. v. Jerry Hal Saliterman, 868 F.2d 999 (8th Cir. 1989). “§ 2518 , and the Minnesota statute, Minn. Stat. § 626.06 , because the warrant did not contain a statement that it must terminate upon attainment of the objective of the wiretap.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.