Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 629.42 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1979 c 233 s 42]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1947–1993 · leading case: State v. Paulick, 151 N.W.2d 591 (Minn. 1967).
State v. Paulick, 151 N.W.2d 591 (Minn. 1967). · cites it 4× “The statutes which authorize the issuance of complaints and warrants are somewhat in conflict.”
Hoppe v. Klapperich, 28 N.W.2d 780 (Minn. 1947). · cites it 2× “§ 629.42, which fact was or should have been known to all the defendants.”
State Ex Rel. Duhn v. Tahash, 147 N.W.2d 382 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 2× “Borden Deputy Clerk” There is no showing that the complaining witness was examined by a magistrate as required by § 629.42, 2 and petitioner asserts the complaint on its face inadequately establishes probable cause for the issuance of the warrant.”
State v. Ramsey Cnty. Dist. Court, 150 N.W.2d 18 (Minn. 1967). · cites it 2× “§ 629.42. 4 The fact that a warrant thus issued is defective does not necessarily render custody unlawful under all circumstances, however.”
City of St. Paul v. Tobler, 153 N.W.2d 440 (Minn. 1967). · cites it 2× “” Section 629.42 provides: “Upon complaint made to any such magistrate that a criminal offense has been committed, he shall examine, on oath, the complainant and any witnesses who shall appear before him, reduce the complaint to writing, and cause it to be subscribed by the…”
Case v. Pung, 454 N.W.2d 275 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 629.42 (repealed 1979) (court to examine complainant and supporting witnesses).”
Op. Atty. Gen. 494a-1 (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1993). · cites it 6× “34 requires the issuance of tickets only in cases where an arrest is authorized Our 1967 opinion was also based upon Minn. Stat. § 629.42 (1965).l We concluded that for a misdemeanor traffic offense committed outside an officer’s presence "the best procedure in order to effect…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.