Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 640. STATE PRISON AND REFORMATORIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 640.10 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 243.49]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1951–1968 · leading case: State v. Dahlgren, 107 N.W.2d 299 (Minn. 1961).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Dahlgren, 107 N.W.2d 299 (Minn. 1961). · cites it 3× “adequate showing that because of his poverty he is unable to pay for a transcript which he reasonably needs in presenting the alleged errors raised for appellate review, the district court shall, at the expense of the county in which the defendant was convicted, order a…”
State ex rel. Schwanke v. Utecht, 47 N.W.2d 99 (Minn. 1951). “We have not overlooked the failure of the clerk of the court to comply with § 640.10 with respect to the furnishing of certain commitment papers' when a convict is sentenced to the state prison.”
State ex rel. Williams v. Cnty. of Hennepin, 89 N.W.2d 907 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 2× “uate showing that because of his poverty he is unable to pay for a transcript which he reasonably needs in presenting the alleged errors raised for appellate review, the district court shall, at the expense of the county in which the defendant was convicted, order a transcript,…”
State ex rel. Kons v. Tahash, 161 N.W.2d 826 (Minn. 1968). “1957, § 640.10) provided that “in cases in which the convict pleads guilty, his detailed account of the facts indicating his guilt” shall be included in the record.”
State v. James, 89 N.W.2d 904 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 2× “04, ‘or on the synopsis of the testimony prepared pursuant to section 640.10, or on any other abridgment or report of testimony made available by law, or on any combination of such available reports or records.”
State v. Johnson, 96 N.W.2d 389 (Minn. 1959). · cites it 2× “04, or on the synopsis of the testimony prepared pursuant to section 640.10, or on any other abridgment or report of testimony made available by law, or on any combination of such available reports or records.”
State ex rel. Elkins v. Cnty. of Ramsey, 99 N.W.2d 895 (Minn. 1959). · cites it 2× “04, or on the synopsis of the testimony prepared pursuant to section 640.10, or on any other abridgment or report of testimony made available by law, or on any combination of such available reports or records.”
State v. Mlynczak, 123 N.W.2d 358 (Minn. 1963). · cites it 2× “04, or on the synopsis of the testimony *245 prepared pursuant to section 640.10, or on any other abridgment or report of testimony made available by law, or on any combination of such available reports or records.”
State ex rel. Farrington v. Tahash, 115 N.W.2d 921 (Minn. 1962). · cites it 2× “04, or on the synopsis of the testimony prepared pursuant to section 640.10, or on any other abridgment or report of testimony made available by law, or on any combination of such available reports or records.”
State v. Haller, 78 N.W.2d 389 (Minn. 1956). “05; or the synopsis of the testimony prepared pursuant to *573 § 640.10 may singly, or in combination, be sufficient to provide an adequate review in compliance with, the due process and equal protection clauses of U.”
State ex rel. Nyrud v. Tahash, 115 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. 1962). “The committing court elicited none of the pertinent facts required by §§ 640.10 and 640.21 prior to sentence. The matter is therefore remanded with directions that the trial court conduct a hearing on the petition to afford relator and his witnesses an opportunity to testify…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.