Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 7.06 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 16A.012]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2016 · leading case: Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc., 645 F. Supp. 2d 734 (D. Minnesota 2009).
Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc., 645 F. Supp. 2d 734 (D. Minnesota 2009). “§ 7.06; NextGen Agreement *743 § 12.1; Horizon Agreement § 12.”
Northland Ins. Companies v. Blaylock, 115 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (D. Minnesota 2000). “Epstein, Epstein on Intellectual Property § 7.06 (4th ed. 1999) (“The noncommercial use exception ‘is intended to prevent courts from enjoining constitutionally-protected speech.”
Minneapolis Cmty. Dev. Agency v. Opus Nw., LLC, 582 N.W.2d 596 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “2A Nichols on Eminent Domain, § 7.06[24][c], at p. 7-242 (Matthew Bender revised 3d ed.”
Matter of MCDA, 582 N.W.2d 596 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “2A Nichols on Eminent Domain, § 7.06[24][c], at p. 7-242 (Matthew Bender revised 3d ed.”
State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “Judges’ Ass’n, Minnesota Practice – Jury Instruction Guides, § 7.06, at 29 (5th ed. Supp. 2010).2 The district court essentially adopted CRIMJIG 7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.