Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 7.22 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 16A.061]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1982–2012 · leading case: U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 802 N.W.2d 363 (Minn. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 802 N.W.2d 363 (Minn. 2011). · cites it 2× “Garon, Corporation Law & Practice § 7.22 (2d ed.2004). Although Minnesota’s dissenters’ rights provisions are “among the most liberal,” they do not explicitly provide for dissenters’ rights when fractionalized shares are cashed out pursuant to Minn.”

Advanced Commc'n Design, Inc. v. Follett, 615 N.W.2d 285 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 3× “, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22, at 325 (1994). 11 . Section 302A.”

White Bear Lake Care Ctr., Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 319 N.W.2d 7 (Minn. 1982). “Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 7.22 (2 ed. 1979). If, however, neither of the above two situations exists decision in favor of White Bear is required.”

Spinnaker Software Corp. v. Nicholson, 495 N.W.2d 441 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “11 of the Principles of Corporate Governance § 7.22 (the “ALI standard”) and the rule of the Massachusetts Court of Appeals in BNE Mass.”

In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees, 820 N.W.2d 563 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). “It appears that, under federal law, the duration and the consistency of an agency’s interpretation of a statute are just two of several factors that determine the level of deference to be given to an agency’s interpretation of a statute.”

— Minn. Stat. § 7.22(a) — 1 case

Advanced Commc'n Design, Inc. v. Follett, 615 N.W.2d 285 (Minn. 2000). “, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22, at 325 (1994). 11 . Section 302A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.