Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 72A.08 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2020 [Repealed, 2022 c 93 art 2 s 43]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2006 · leading case: Schermer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 721 N.W.2d 307 (Minn. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Schermer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 721 N.W.2d 307 (Minn. 2006). · cites it 16× “The court also finds evidence of legislative approval of the filed rate doctrine in Minn.Stat. § 72A.08 (2004) because it prohibits rebates.”

Ins. Comm'r for the State v. Engelman, 692 A.2d 474 (Md. 1997). “2070]; Minn.Stat. §§ 72A.08, 72A.12, 72A.20; Miss.”

Doe v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., 107 F.3d 1297 (8th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. §§ 72A.08(2) (1996) (prohibiting payment of rebate to insured), 72A.”

In Re Sentry Ins. Payback Prog. Filing, 447 N.W.2d 454 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 72A.08 (1988). Minnesota’s automobile insurance statutes limit the reasons a policy may not be renewed.”

— Minn. Stat. § 72A.08(2) — 1 case

Doe v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., 107 F.3d 1297 (8th Cir. 1997). “See Minn. Stat. §§ 72A.08(2) (1996) (prohibiting payment of rebate to insured), 72A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.