Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 80A.90 (2026)

Section 703; Application Of Act To Existing Proceeding And Existing Rights And Duties

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Applicability of predecessor act to pending proceedings and existing rights. The predecessor act exclusively governs all actions or proceedings that are pending on August 1, 2007, or may be instituted on the basis of conduct occurring before August 1, 2007, but a civil action may not be maintained to enforce any liability under the predecessor act unless instituted within any period of limitation that applied when the cause of action accrued or within five years after August 1, 2007, whichever is earlier.

(b) Continued effectiveness under predecessor act. All effective registrations under the predecessor act, all administrative orders relating to the registrations, rules, statements of policy, interpretative opinions, declaratory rulings, no action determinations, and conditions imposed on the registrations under the predecessor act remain in effect while they would have remained in effect if this chapter had not been enacted. They are considered to have been filed, issued, or composed under this chapter, but are exclusively governed by the predecessor act.

(c) Applicability of predecessor act to offers or sales. The predecessor act exclusively applies to an offer or sale made within one year after August 1, 2007, pursuant to an offering made in good faith before August 1, 2007, on the basis of an exemption available under the predecessor act.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2010 · leading case: TROOIEN v. Mansour, 608 F.3d 1020 (8th Cir. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

TROOIEN v. Mansour, 608 F.3d 1020 (8th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 80A.90(a) (2006); see also 2006 Minn.”

Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 2× “But because "[t]he predecessor act exclusively governs all actions or proceedings that are pending on [August 1, 2007,] or may be instituted on the basis of conduct occurring before August 1, 2007,” Minn.Stat. § 80A.90(a), this case is governed by Minn.”

Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc., 759 N.W.2d 67 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 80A.90(a) (2006); see also 2006 Minn.”

— Minn. Stat. § 80A.90(a) — 3 cases

TROOIEN v. Mansour, 608 F.3d 1020 (8th Cir. 2010). “Minn.Stat. § 80A.90(a) (2006); see also 2006 Minn.”

Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2008). “But because "[t]he predecessor act exclusively governs all actions or proceedings that are pending on [August 1, 2007,] or may be instituted on the basis of conduct occurring before August 1, 2007,” Minn.Stat. § 80A.90(a), this case is governed by Minn.”

Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc., 759 N.W.2d 67 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “Minn.Stat. § 80A.90(a) (2006); see also 2006 Minn.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.