Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-507 (2026)
Effect of certain events on effectiveness of financing statement
✓ current as of July 2026
- (a) A filed financing statement remains effective with respect to collateral that is sold, exchanged, leased, licensed, or otherwise disposed of and in which a security interest or agricultural lien continues, even if the secured party knows of or consents to the disposition.
- (b) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) and Section 75-9-508, a financing statement is not rendered ineffective if, after the financing statement is filed, the information provided in the financing statement becomes seriously misleading under Section 75-9-506.
- (c) If the name that a filed financing statement provides for a debtor becomes insufficient as the name of the debtor under Section 75-9-503(a) so that the financing statement becomes seriously misleading under Section 75-9-506:
- (1) The financing statement is effective to perfect a security interest in collateral acquired by the debtor before, or within four (4) months after, the filed financing statement becomes seriously misleading; and
- (2) The financing statement is not effective to perfect a security interest in collateral acquired by the debtor more than four (4) months after the filed financing statement becomes seriously misleading, unless an amendment to the financing statement which renders the financing statement not seriously misleading is filed within four (4) months after the financing statement becomes seriously misleading.
Former 1972 Code § 75-9-507 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-507; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-507, eff. 3/31/1968] is now found in comparable provisions enacted at §§ 75-9-625 and 75-9-627 by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1. Present § 75-9-507 was derived from former 1972 Code § 75-9-402 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-402; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-402; Laws, 1968, ch. 490, § 1; Laws, 1977, ch. 452, § 25, eff. 4/1/1978] and was enacted by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1, eff. 1/1/2002.
Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 451, SB 2609, 14, eff. 7/1/2013.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1986–1986 · leading case: United States v. Bryant, 628 F. Supp. 1444 (N.D. Miss. 1986).
United States v. Bryant, 628 F. Supp. 1444 (N.D. Miss. 1986). “” In meeting this burden, the erditor may not rely upon the statutory presumption that certain sales are deemed “commercially reasonable,” see Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-507(2) (1972), since the creditor’s failure to give the required notice renders this presumption inapplicable.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-507(2) — 1 case
United States v. Bryant, 628 F. Supp. 1444 (N.D. Miss. 1986). “” In meeting this burden, the erditor may not rely upon the statutory presumption that certain sales are deemed “commercially reasonable,” see Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-507(2) (1972), since the creditor’s failure to give the required notice renders this presumption inapplicable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.