Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 260.350 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  260.350.  Short title. — Sections 260.350 to 260.430 shall be known and may be cited as the "Missouri Hazardous Waste Management Law".

­­--------

(L. 1977 H.B. 318 § 1)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1984–2007 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc., 825 S.W.2d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc., 825 S.W.2d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 19× “'" § 260.350, RSMo 1986. [4] Section 260.360(14), RSMo Supp.”
Mueller v. Missouri Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Comm'n, 904 S.W.2d 552 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 7× “3(3), 4 empowers the Commission to: “Hold hearings, issue notices of hearings and subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence, administer oaths and take testimony as the commission deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of sections 260.350…”
Mertzlufft v. Bunker Resources Recycling & Reclamation, Inc., 760 S.W.2d 592 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 5× “3, RSMo 1986, which provides that “[a]ny person adversely affected in fact by any violation of sections 260.350 to 260.430 (Hazardous Waste Management Law) or of any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder may sue for injunctive relief against such violation.”
Browning-Ferris Indus. of Kansas City, Inc. v. Dance, 671 S.W.2d 801 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “No toxic hazardous waste, radioactive material or explosives shall be accepted; (D) hazardous waste landfills which shall accept only materials determined to be toxic or hazardous under the terms of the Missouri Hazardous Waste Management Law, Section 260.350, et seq. RSMo.…”
People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Tang, 805 N.E.2d 243 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “1992), the court reversed the dismissal of a corporate officer defendant, finding that he could be liable for the corporation’s violation of the Missouri Hazardous Waste Management Law ( Mo. Rev. Stat. § 260.350 (1986)), because the officer “was a ‘hands-on’ operator.”
Gen. Elec. Co. v. Litton Bus. Sys., Inc., 715 F. Supp. 949 (W.D. Mo. 1989). “§ 260.350 et seq. (referred to as the “Missouri Superfund Statute”), including the provisions dealing with abandoned and uncontrolled sites, R.”
State ex rel. Bunker Resource Recycling & Reclamation, Inc. v. Mehan, 782 S.W.2d 381 (Mo. 1990). · cites it 2× “203 or a hazardous waste facility permitted pursuant to §§ 260.350 to 260.430. According to the stipulation, the only person or entity who could be denied a permit because of the above-quoted statute is Bunker.”
Missouri v. Westinghouse Elec., LLC, 487 F. Supp. 2d 1076 (E.D. Mo. 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 9607 , the Missouri Hazardous Waste Management Law, Mo.Rev.Stat. § 260.350 et seq, and the Missouri Clean Water Law, Mo.”
Missouri Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Valley Steel Prods. Co. (In Re Valley Steel Prods. Co.), 157 B.R. 442 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1993). “§ 260.350 et seq. (Vernon 1990) and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.”
State Ex Rel. Bunker Res. Recycling & Rec., Inc. v. Mehan, 782 S.W.2d 381 (Mo. 1990). · cites it 2× “203 or a hazardous waste facility permitted pursuant to §§ 260.350 to 260.430. According to the stipulation, the only person or entity who could be denied a permit because of the above-quoted statute is Bunker.”
People ex rel. Madigan v. Tang (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “1992), the court reversed the dismissal of a corporate officer defendant, finding that he could be liable for the corporation's violation of the Missouri Hazardous Waste Management Law ( Mo. Rev. Stat. §260.350 (1986), because the officer "was a 'hands-on' operator.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.