287.110. Scope of chapter as to injuries and diseases covered. — 1. This chapter shall apply to all cases within its provisions except those exclusively covered by any federal law.
2. This chapter shall apply to all injuries received and occupational diseases contracted in this state, regardless of where the contract of employment was made, and also to all injuries received and occupational diseases contracted outside of this state under contract of employment made in this state, unless the contract of employment in any case shall otherwise provide, and also to all injuries received and occupational diseases contracted outside of this state where the employee's employment was principally localized in this state within thirteen calendar weeks of the injury or diagnosis of the occupational disease.
Notes of Decisions
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Ken Kauffman & Sons Excavating, L.L.C., 248 S.W.3d 101 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 44× “During a special session in September 2005, the legislature again amended subsection 1 of section 287.110. With the amendment during the special session, the legislature changed the language back to its original version as first enacted in 1939 and unchanged until the 2005…”
State Ex Rel. KCP & L Greater Missouri Operations Co. v. Cook, 353 S.W.3d 14 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 8× “At the same time, the legislature amended section 287.110, the provision setting forth *36 the scope of the Act, to provide that the Workers' Compensation Law applied to all occupational diseases in addition to all injuries.”
Garza v. Valley Crest Landscape Maint., Inc., 224 S.W.3d 61 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 11× “But, they do not meet the requirement of Taylor, of purposeful, affirmatively dangerous conduct. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Counts II, III, and IV of the petition.”
Stufflebean v. Crete Carrier Corp., 895 S.W.2d 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 5× “*117 Appellant argues that the jurisdictional requirements of section 287.110(2), RSMo 1986 2 were not established under the record.”
Stoddard v. Wilson Freight, Inc., 651 S.W.2d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 5× “See § 287.110, RSMo 1978. Claimant could file his workmen’s compensation claim either in Kansas or Missouri, or, as we shall see, in both.”
Amesquita v. Gilster-Mary Lee Corp., 408 S.W.3d 293 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “067 defines the term “occupational disease” and provides that “[a]n injury by occupational disease is compensable only if the occupational exposure was the prevailing factor in causing both the resulting medical condition and disability.”
Payne v. St. Louis Grain Corp., 562 S.W.2d 102 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977).
· cites it 2× “Section 287.110(2) states, inter alia, that Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Law applies to “all injuries received and occupational diseases contracted outside of this state under contract of employment made in this state.”
Petersen v. Cent. Pattern Co., 562 S.W.2d 153 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978).
“The Commission found that Andrew’s injuries occurred in Illinois but that claimant had failed to establish that Andrew’s injuries were received under a contract of employment made in Missouri, ruling that in the absence of such showing it was without jurisdiction under §…”
Woodward v. J. J. Grier Co., 270 S.W.2d 155 (Mo. Ct. App. 1954).
· cites it 4× “By virtue of the provisions of Section 287.110(2), Revised Statutes of Missouri 1949 [V.”
Redden v. Dan Redden Co., 859 S.W.2d 207 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 2× “See § 287.110(2) RSMo 1986 and Mosley, 690 S.”
Hall v. Denver-Chicago Int'l, Inc., 481 S.W.2d 622 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972).
· cites it 2× “In considering this contention the Industrial Commission stated: “ * * * We find that the agreement effective April 1, 1967 by and between the employers bargaining agent and the Union of which the employee was a member, constituted not a new contract of employment as…”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.110(2) — 8 cases
Stufflebean v. Crete Carrier Corp., 895 S.W.2d 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
“*117 Appellant argues that the jurisdictional requirements of section 287.110(2), RSMo 1986 2 were not established under the record.”
Payne v. St. Louis Grain Corp., 562 S.W.2d 102 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977).
“Section 287.110(2) states, inter alia, that Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Law applies to “all injuries received and occupational diseases contracted outside of this state under contract of employment made in this state.”
Petersen v. Cent. Pattern Co., 562 S.W.2d 153 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978).
“The Commission found that Andrew’s injuries occurred in Illinois but that claimant had failed to establish that Andrew’s injuries were received under a contract of employment made in Missouri, ruling that in the absence of such showing it was without jurisdiction under §…”
Woodward v. J. J. Grier Co., 270 S.W.2d 155 (Mo. Ct. App. 1954).
“By virtue of the provisions of Section 287.110(2), Revised Statutes of Missouri 1949 [V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.