Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 288
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.010 (2026)

Title of law

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  288.010.  Title of law. — This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Missouri Employment Security Law".

­­--------

(L. 1951 p. 564)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1954–2023 · leading case: Producers Produce Co. v. Indus. Comm'n of Missouri Div. of Emp. Sec., 291 S.W.2d 166 (Mo. 1956).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Producers Produce Co. v. Indus. Comm'n of Missouri Div. of Emp. Sec., 291 S.W.2d 166 (Mo. 1956). · cites it 4× “Section 288.010 RSMo 1949, provided that.”
Stahl v. Hank's Cheesecakes, LLC, 489 S.W.3d 338 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “For over sixty years, the explicit purpose of the Missouri Employment Security Law, Section 288.010, et seq., has been to provide economic stability for the' citizens of Missouri who have become unemployed “through no fault of their mm.”
Mita Biswas v. Div. of Emp. Sec., 496 S.W.3d 587 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Missouri Employment Security Law, Section 288.010, et seq., defines "deputy” as "a representative of the division designated to make investigations and administrative deter-ruinations on claims or matters of employer liability or to perform related work[.”
Ayers v. Sylvia Thompson Residence Ctr., 211 S.W.3d 195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). “Kirk Ayers appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order denying his claim for unemployment benefits pursuant to Missouri’s Employment Security Law, § 288.010, et seq. The Commis *197 sion determined that Mr.”
Christensen v. Am. Food & Vending Servs., Inc., 191 S.W.3d 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “2 because Employer presented no evidence that Claimant’s use of marijuana affected her ability to perform her work duties.”
White v. St. Louis Teachers Union, 217 S.W.3d 382 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). “§ 288.010. “The rationale of the Missouri Employment Security Law is to provide benefits to persons ‘unemployed through no fault of their own.”
Shelby v. Hayward Baker, Inc., 128 S.W.3d 164 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “Norman Shelby (“Shelby”) appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his claim for unemployment benefits pursuant to Missouri’s Employment Security Law, § 288.010, et seq. 1 The Commission decided that Shelby was not entitled…”
Smith v. U.S. Postal Serv., 69 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002). “Frances June Smith (“Employee”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying her unemployment benefits under the Missouri Employment Security Law, § 288.010 et seq. 1 Employee alleges Commission’s decision is “against the weight of…”
Tamko Bldg. Prods., Inc. v. Frankoski, 258 S.W.3d 575 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See section 288.010 et seq. Included within this statutory scheme is a section that prevents individuals from receiving unemployment benefits if “a deputy finds that a claimant has been discharged for misconduct connected with the claimant’s work[.”
Hurlbut v. Labor & Indus. Relations Comm'n, 761 S.W.2d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). “§§ 288.010 et seq. and in the light of its [undisputed] facts.”
Harrison v. Woods Super Markets, Inc., 115 S.W.3d 384 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003). “RSMo § 288.010 et seq. All references to statutes are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.”
Rapp v. Indus. Comm'n of Missoure, 360 S.W.2d 366 (Mo. Ct. App. 1962). · cites it 2× “565; Section 288.010], although no doubt fully aware that “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” [Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Sc.”
Show all 36 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.