304.014.Rules of the road to be observed. — Every person operating or driving a vehicle upon the highways of this state shall observe and comply with the following rules of the road.
(1951) Instruction authorizing recovery on finding defendant negligently failed to stop his vehicle at intersection held erroneous because it does not require finding that defendant had reason to apprehend danger of collision. Lillard v. Bradford, 241 (A.), 243 S.W.2d 359.
(1952) Where vehicle was operated on icy pavement in the lane adjacent to center line of six lane street and collided with vehicle making left turn in front of it from extreme right-hand lane, negligence of operator was for jury. Wines v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (A.), 246 S.W.2d 525.
(1952) Requirement to operate vehicles as close to the right-hand side of the highway as practicable does not receive literal construction, but has reference to the attending circumstances and to the usable or passable way. Moss v. Stevens (Mo.), 247 S.W.2d 782.
(1953) Where, on conflicting evidence, court found that plaintiff began passing operation and reasonably expected to complete it before reaching intersection, it was not error to refuse instruction requiring finding for defendant on theory plaintiff was attempting to pass at intersection in violation of this section. Cockrill v. Buchanan (A.), 259 S.W.2d 696.
(1953) Where there was pile of loose chat on black top highway at intersection, question of negligence where driver, in making left turn, failed to "run beyond the center of the intersection ..... before turning ....." as required by subsection 6 of § 304.020 (prior to its repeal in 1953) held for jury. Lix v. Gastian (A.), 261 S.W.2d 497.
(1954) Fact that plaintiff drove his car in the one lane usable part of county road does not convict him of negligence as a matter of law, because he was not on right side of highway at time of collision at intersection. Hadley v. Smith (A.), 268 S.W.2d 444.
Southers v. City of Farmington, 263 S.W.3d 603 (Mo. 2008). “(2) The driver of an emergency vehicle may: (a)Park or stand irrespective of the provisions of sections 304.014 to 304.025; (b) Proceed past a red or stop signal or stop sign, but only after slowing down as may be necessary for safe operation; (c) Exceed the prima facie speed…”
Davis v. Lambert-St. Louis Int'l Airport, 193 S.W.3d 760 (Mo. 2006). “shall not sound the siren thereon or have the front red lights or blue lights on except when such vehicle is responding to an emergency call or when in pursuit of an actual or suspected law violator, or when responding to, but not upon returning from, a fire; (2) The driver of…”
State v. REANDO, 313 S.W.3d 734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2דads or highways of sufficient width a vehicle shall be driven upon the right half of the roadway, except as follows: (1) When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction pursuant to the rules governing such movement; (2) When placing a vehicle in a…”
State v. Dunn, 147 S.W.3d 75 (Mo. 2004). · cites it 4ד” Section 304.014 requires every person operating or driving a vehicle upon the highways of this state to observe and comply with all of the rules of road outlined in chapter 304.”
State v. Swartz, 517 S.W.3d 40 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). “roads or highways of sufficient width a vehicle shall be driven upon the right half of the roadway, except as follows: (1) When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction pursuant to the rules governing such movement; (2) When placing a vehicle in…”
Bowman v. Heffron, 318 S.W.2d 269 (Mo. 1958). · cites it 3דAppellant refers to the provisions of Section 304.014 and Section 304.015 RSMo (Laws 1953, p.”
Stanley v. City of Indep., 995 S.W.2d 485 (Mo. 1999). “*487 By statute, police officers may disregard traffic regulations in certain situations: (2) The driver of an emergency vehicle may: (a) Park or stand irrespective of the provisions of sections 304.014 to 304.026; (b) Proceed past a red or stop signal or stop sign, but only…”
Courtney v. Emmons, 702 S.W.2d 139 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2דLikewise, no exception can be taken with appellant’s reference to the requirement of motorists as dictated by § 304.014, RSMo 1978, and the host of cases appellant has cited within the applicability of said statute.”
Oberkramer v. City of Ellisville, 706 S.W.2d 440 (Mo. 1986). “026; (b) Proceed past a red or stop signal or stop sign, but only after slowing down as may be necessary for safe operation; (c) Exceed the prima facie speed limit so long as he does not endanger life or property; (d) Disregard regulations governing direction of movement or…”
Buck v. Union Elec. Co., 887 S.W.2d 430 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). “In addition, the rules of the road, as codified in §§ 304.014, 304.015 RSMo Cum.Sup.1993, require operators to drive as near to the right hand side of the road as practicable.”
State v. Chamberlin, 872 S.W.2d 615 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). “blic roads or highways of sufficient width a vehicle shall be driven upon the right half of the roadway, except as follows: (1) When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction under the rules governing such movement; (2) When placing a vehicle in’…”
German v. Kansas City, 512 S.W.2d 135 (Mo. 1974). · cites it 2דublic roads or highways of sufficient width a vehicle shall be driven upon the right half of the roadway, except as follows: (1) When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction under the rules governing such movement; (2) When placing a vehicle in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.