Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 334.103 (2026)

Automatic revocation or reinstatement of license, grounds

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

334.103. Automatic revocation or reinstatement of license, grounds. — 1. A license issued under this chapter by the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts shall be automatically revoked at such time as the final trial proceedings are concluded whereby a licensee has been adjudicated and found guilty, or has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, in a felony criminal prosecution under the laws of the state of Missouri, the laws of any other state, or the laws of the United States of America for any offense reasonably related to the qualifications, functions or duties of their profession, or for any felony offense involving fraud, dishonesty or an act of violence, or for any felony offense involving moral turpitude, whether or not sentence is imposed, or, upon the final and unconditional revocation of the license to practice their profession in another state or territory upon grounds for which revocation is authorized in this state following a review of the record of the proceedings and upon a formal motion of the state board of registration for the healing arts. The license of any such licensee shall be automatically reinstated if the conviction or the revocation is ultimately set aside upon final appeal in any court of competent jurisdiction.

2. Anyone who has been denied a license, permit or certificate to practice in another state shall automatically be denied a license to practice in this state. However, the board of healing arts may set up other qualifications by which such person may ultimately be qualified and licensed to practice in Missouri.

--------

(L. 1986 H.B. 1029, A.L. 2006 S.B. 756, A.L. 2011 H.B. 265)

(2000) State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts lacks authority to stay the revocation of a license and place the licensee on probation; statute mandates single option of revocation. Cantrell v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 26 S.W.3d 824 (Mo.App.W.D.).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1988–2013 · leading case: Rosenberg v. Shostak, 405 S.W.3d 8 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rosenberg v. Shostak, 405 S.W.3d 8 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Mo.Rev.Stat. § 334.103. Similarly, the other states’ medical boards had various options for disciplining Plaintiff in light of his conviction.”

Gard v. State Bd. of Reg. for the Healing Arts, 747 S.W.2d 726 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Note § 334.103 RSMo., (L.1986, H.B. No. 1029, § 1) now providing for automatic revocation of a license at the time the final trial proceedings are concluded where a physician has been found guilty.”

Francois v. State Bd. of Reg. for the Healing Arts, 880 S.W.2d 601 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “On August 1, 1988, the Board issued an order revoking his license pursuant to § 334.103 RSMo 1986. The Board determined Dr.”

Tumialan v. State Bd. of Reg. for the Healing Arts, 193 S.W.3d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 14× “Luis Tu-mialan’s medical license under section 334.103. 1 We reverse and remand for the circuit court to vacate its judgment as being void for lack of jurisdiction.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.