Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 334.250 (2026)

Unlawful practice, fraudulent filing of license or identification, penalties

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  334.250.  Unlawful practice, fraudulent filing of license or identification, penalties. — 1.  Any person who violates section 334.010 shall, upon conviction, be adjudged guilty of a class D felony for each and every offense; and treating each patient is considered a separate offense.

  2.  Any person filing or attempting to file as his own a license of another, or forged affidavit of identification, shall be guilty of a class D felony and upon conviction thereof shall be subjected to such fine and imprisonment as is provided by the statutes of this state for the crime of forgery.

­­--------

(L. 1959 S.B. 50 § 19, A.L. 1981 S.B. 16, A.L. 1990 S.B. 737, A.L. 2014 S.B. 491)

Effective 1-01-17

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1962–1986 · leading case: State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Clark, 713 S.W.2d 621 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).
State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Clark, 713 S.W.2d 621 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 5× “The complaint then charged that such practice by appellant was both an illegal and criminal act, as defined by § 334.250, RSMo Supp. 1982, § 329.250, RSMo Supp.”
State ex rel. Gibson v. Missouri Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 365 S.W.2d 773 (Mo. Ct. App. 1963). · cites it 2× “” Section 334.250 provides those who violate Section 334.”
State v. Errington, 355 S.W.2d 952 (Mo. 1962). “010, as reenacted effective August 29, 1959, provides that it shall be unlawful for any person not a registered physician within the meaning of the law “to practice medicine,” and § 334.250, as reenacted, provides that any person “who violates section 334.”
State v. Leimer, 382 S.W.2d 718 (Mo. Ct. App. 1964). · cites it 2× “” The pertinent portion of Section 334.250 is as follows: “1. Any person who violates section 334.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.