Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 353
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 353.010 (2026)

Citation of chapter

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  353.010.  Citation of chapter. — This chapter shall be known and may be cited and referred to as "The Urban Redevelopment Corporations Law".

­­--------

(L. 1943 p. 751 § 1, A.L. 1945 p. 1242, A.L. 1969 S.B. 373, A.L. 1976 H.B. 1369, A.L. 1988 H.B. 1738, A.L. 1993 H.B. 566 merged with S.B. 376)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1980–2020 · leading case: City of North Kansas City v. K.C. Beaton Holding Co., 417 S.W.3d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of North Kansas City v. K.C. Beaton Holding Co., 417 S.W.3d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “; The Urban Redevelopment Corporations Law, §§ 353.010, RSMo et seq.; and Real Property Tax Increment *832 Allocation Redevelopment Act, §§ 99.”
Rice v. Stoff, 844 S.W.2d 529 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992). “Intervenor claims, inter alia, that the Urban Redevelopment Corporations Law, RSMo § 353.010 et seq. (1986), limits the power of City voters to act on the instant controversy.”
Thomas W. Garland, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 492 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Mo. 1980). “Mercantile was formed pursuant to The Urban Redevelopment Corporations Law of Missouri, §§ 353.010 et seq., R.S.Mo. (1969). Pursuant to this statute, corporations formed for the purpose of redeveloping blighted areas may be granted special privileges, *404 one of which is the…”
City of North Kansas City v. K.C. Beaton Holding Co., LLC Platte Valley Bank of Missouri & Keith Hicklin, No. WD76068 & WD76110 (Mo. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2014). · cites it 2× “; The Urban Redevelopment Corporations Law, §§ 353.010, RSMo et seq.; and Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, §§ 99.”
Staco Elec. Constr. Co. v. City of Kansas City, MO, No. 4:20-cv-00165 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 9, 2020). “§§ 353.010, et seq. (Chapter 353)” (RFP 9).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.