Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 454
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 454.1500 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  454.1500.  Short title. — This act, sections 454.1500 to 454.1728, may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.

­­--------

(L. 2011 H.B. 260)

Effective 6-15-16, see § 454.1728

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Swanson v. Hernandez, 544 S.W.3d 315 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Swanson v. Hernandez, 544 S.W.3d 315 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “The UIFSA, codified in Missouri at Sections 454.1500 to 454.1730, controls the establishment, enforcement, or modification of support orders across state lines.”
DeWitt v. Lechuga, 393 S.W.3d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). “852, 4 and the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (“UIFSA”), §§ 454.1500 to 454.1728, the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over the parties.”
Rosas v. Lopez, 556 S.W.3d 620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). “While these statutes have been recently repealed and replaced by Sections 454.1500 to 454.1730 (UIFSA 2008), the provisions of the 1997 act were in effect during all relevant times.”
Kimberly L. Ball v. Michael R. Ball (Mo. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “Mother claims the trial court erred by modifying the child support judgment under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (“UIFSA”), section 454.1500. Mother claims in conclusory fashion (1) personal jurisdiction was not established over her or (2) even if personal…”
Covert v. Missouri Dep't of Soc. Servs., Fam. Support Div., 513 S.W.3d 377 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). “While these statutes have been recently repealed and replaced by Sections 454.1500 to 454.1730 (UIFSA 2008), the provisions of the 1997 act were in effect during all relevant times.”
Jon P. Whitton v. Heather A. Whitton (NKA Peterson) (Mo. Ct. App. 2025). “Contrary to Father’s argument, there is a procedure for transferring child support cases between states.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.