Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 455.007 (2026)
Mootness doctrine, public interest exception to apply upon expiration of the order
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
455.007. Mootness doctrine, public interest exception to apply upon expiration of the order. — Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to an appeal of a full order of protection which has expired.
--------
(L. 2011 H.B. 111, A.L. 2014 H.B. 1231)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2011–2025 · leading case: K.L.M. v. B.A.G., 532 S.W.3d 706 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
K.L.M. v. B.A.G., 532 S.W.3d 706 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). “(internal quotation omitted); Section 455.007 (Supp. 2014). “Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to an appeal of a full order of protection which has expired.”
C.D.R. v. Wideman, 520 S.W.3d 839 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). “And, in the context of an appeal from a full order of protection, this exception to the mootness doctrine is addressed by section 455.007, RSMo 2016: Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to…”
C.I.A. v. T.E., 423 S.W.3d 844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). “This exception to the mootness doctrine is set forth in section 455.007: Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to an appeal of a full order of protection which: (1) Has expired; and (2)…”
J.S. v. D.C., 368 S.W.3d 289 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012). “, inter alia, to file a memorandum addressing the issue of whether the appeal had become moot or whether the public interest exception applied in light of Section 455.007 RSMo Cum.Supp.2011. This Court ordered the issue of whether the appeal should be dismissed as moot to be…”
TIFFANI AUSTIN, Petitioner-Respondent v. LARRY JARRED, 578 S.W.3d 847 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). “Section 455.007 provides, nevertheless, that “Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to an appeal of a full order of protection which has expired.”
T.C.T. v. Shafinia, 351 S.W.3d 34 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “; § 455.007(2), 2011 Mo. Legis. Serv. 523 (West).”
Hail v. Hail, 380 S.W.3d 655 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012). “007: Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to an appeal of a full order of protection which: (1) [h]as expired; and (2) [sjubjects the person against whom such order is issued to significant…”
K.L.M. v. B.A.G., 532 S.W.3d 706 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). “(internal quotation omitted); Section 455.007 (Supp. 2014). “Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to an appeal of a full order of protection which has expired.”
K.C. v. Kent Chapline (Mo. Ct. App. 2021). “6 However, even if the February 24, 2021 renewal had not occurred, we would still review the merits of Chapline’s appeal pursuant to section 455.007, which provides that, “Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness…”
L.E.C. v. K.R.C. (Mo. Ct. App. 2023). “3 Section 455.007; K.L.M., 532 S.W.3d at 709; C.”
C.I.A. v. T.E. (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). “This exception to the mootness doctrine is set forth in section 455.007: Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine shall apply to an appeal of a full order of 2 Given the disposition of the appeal, the…”
Frank Jindra v. State of Missouri (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). “Statement of Facts On February 23, 2015, Jindra filed in Boone County Circuit Court adult abuse petitions pursuant to Section 455.007 et. seq., requesting ex parte orders of protection against two of his tenants.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 455.007(2): 1 case
T.C.T. v. Shafinia, 351 S.W.3d 34 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “; § 455.007(2), 2011 Mo. Legis. Serv. 523 (West).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.