Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 456
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 456.10 (2026)

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  456.010.  (Repealed L. 2004 H.B. 1511 § A)

­­--------

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Springfield Twp. v. Mellon PSFS Bank, 889 A.2d 1184 (Pa. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Springfield Twp. v. Mellon PSFS Bank, 889 A.2d 1184 (Pa. 2005). · cites it 2× “LEXIS 1863 (2000) (legislative intent of Mo.Rev.Stat. § 456.10 (UFA § 9) to hold depository bank liable only where it receives deposit or pays check with actual knowledge fiduciary is breaching obligation to principal, or with knowledge its action amounts to bad faith); Metro…”
Wiss v. Spitzmiller, 425 S.W.3d 157 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 6× “The petition claimed that Trustees had violated specific Missouri statutes governing the administration of trusts and asked that the court remove [Trustees] pursuant to Section 456.10 — 1001[.2](T)[;] that the court appoint a special fiduciary to take possession of the trust…”
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Elizabeth Molk, 618 S.W.3d 652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 3× “” The probate court exercised the discretion granted to it by § 456.10- 1004 in ordering Appellant to reimburse Anne’s, Catherine’s, and Donald’s grandchild trusts for the attorney’s fees incurred by U.”
Johnathan Boswell v. Thomas J. O'neil, 643 S.W.3d 655 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “1 RSMo Section 456.10–1005 was adopted in 2004. All rule references are to Missouri Court Rules 2020.”
Steven R. Finley v. Karen I. Finley, 683 S.W.3d 328 (Mo. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “Additionally, while the trial court had discretion pursuant to Section 456.10- 1004 to award attorney’s fees not assigned by the MOU, in light of our conclusion that Paragraph 9 of the MOU is unambiguous, the trial court’s order of $12,300 in attorney’s fees expended in…”
In the Matter of the H. Boone Porter Trust created under the deed of trust dated August 1, 1960, as amended by amendment dated May 14, 1968, as reformed by judgment dated July 27, 1999, & as further amended by consent judgment dated November 21, 2002, & April 23, 2004, & also known as registered trust no. 169041, H. Boone Porter, III. v. Caroline Porter Hayes, 666 S.W.3d 186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “6 Following a bench trial, the court denied Boone’s request to amend the trust to change the form of organization and capital requirements for the corporate co-trustee.”
In re The GLENDALE LEE BECKING TRUST, under date of February 21, 1995 as amended on December 4, 1997 & the G.L. BECKING TRUST f/b/o CYNTHIA BECKING CYNTHIA BECKING, Co-Tr., Plaintiff-Appellant/Respondent v. DUSTIN K. NEELEY, Co-Tr., Defendant-Cross-Appellant/Respondent & LANA BECKING & COBY AYERS, Intervenors/Cross-Appellants, 648 S.W.3d 810 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 456.10- 1004;[3] c. Order the removal of [Son] as [c]o-Trustee from [Mother’s trust] because he has taken unreasonable positions regarding the interpretation and construction of [the Trust Agreement] and has deliberately attempted and has in fact flouted the will of the…”
Forrest K. Backer, Jr. v. David A. Backer, 705 S.W.3d 632 (Mo. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 456.10- 1001.1 (A “breach of trust” is “[a] violation by a trustee of a duty the trustee owes to a beneficiary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.