Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.019 (2026)
Citation of law
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
577.019. Citation of law. — Sections 577.019 to 577.021 shall be known as the Alan Woods Law.
--------
(L. 2006 S.B. 872, et al., § 577.020 subsec. 1)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2008–2023 · leading case: Kristin Nicole Stiers v. Dir. of Revenue, 477 S.W.3d 611 (Mo. 2016).
Kristin Nicole Stiers v. Dir. of Revenue, 477 S.W.3d 611 (Mo. 2016). “3 states: “Chemical analysis of the person’s breath, blood, saliva, or urine to be considered valid pursuant to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041 shall be performed according to methods approved by the state department of health and senior services by licensed 12…”
Schneider v. Dir. of Revenue, 339 S.W.3d 533 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “Chemical analysis of the person’s breath, blood, saliva, or urine to be considered valid pursuant to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041 shall be performed according to methods approved by the state department of health and senior services by licensed medical personnel…”
State v. Burks, 373 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012). “The provisions of sections 577.019 and 577.020 shall not apply to a test administered prior to arrest pursuant to this section.”
Ross v. Dir. of Revenue, 311 S.W.3d 732 (Mo. 2010). “She maintains the implied consent law language stating that implied consent is given “subject to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041” means the 90-minute time limitation of section 577.”
State v. Eisenhour, 410 S.W.3d 771 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). “The provisions of sections 577.019 and 577.020 shall not apply to a test administered prior to arrest pursuant to this section.”
State v. Ross, 344 S.W.3d 790 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “Chapter 577 requires the “state department of health and senior services [to] approve satisfactory techniques, devices, equipment, or methods to be considered valid pursuant to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041 and [to] establish standards to ascertain the…”
State of Missouri v. Christopher Pickering, 473 S.W.3d 698 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015). ““Chapter 577 requires the ‘state department of health and senior services [to] approve satisfactory techniques, devices, equipment-, or methods to be considered valid pursuant to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041 and [to] establish standards to ascertain the…”
State v. Yarbrough, 332 S.W.3d 882 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “020, states in part: “Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given consent to, subject to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041, a chemical test or tests of the person’s breath, blood, saliva, or urine.”
State v. Ostdiek, 351 S.W.3d 758 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “Chapter 577 requires the “state department of health and senior services [to] approve satisfactory techniques, devices, equipment, or methods to be considered valid pursuant to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041 and [to] establish standards to ascertain the…”
State of Missouri v. Steven William Shoemaker, 448 S.W.3d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). “Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given consent to, subject to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041, a chemical test or tests of the person's breath, blood, saliva or urine for the purpose of…”
State v. Dvorak, 295 S.W.3d 493 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). “020 provides in pertinent part: Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given consent to, subject to the provisions of sections 577.019 to 577.041, a chemical test or tests of the person’s breath, blood, saliva or…”
State v. Robertson, 328 S.W.3d 745 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). “3 specifically says, “The provisions of sections 577.019 and 577.020 shall not apply to a test administered prior to arrest pursuant to this section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.