Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 632.435 (2026)
Habeas corpus
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
632.435. Habeas corpus. — Any person detained under this chapter shall be entitled to apply for a writ of habeas corpus.
--------
(L. 1980 H.B. 1724)
CROSS REFERENCE:
Alcohol and drug abuse detention, right of application for writ of habeas corpus, 631.175
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: State v. McKee, 39 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. McKee, 39 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001). “1982, both set out, in relevant part, that the “provisions of [section 632.435, RSMo], ... apply to persons com *570 mitted [under § 552.”
In re C.T., 432 S.W.3d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). “6 Section 632.435 authorizes a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”
State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster v. The Honorable Gary Oxenhandler, Circuit Judge of Callaway Cnty., & Judy Groner, Circuit Clerk Callaway Cnty. Circuit Court, 491 S.W.3d 576 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). “” Section 632.435 provides that “[a]ny person detained under this chapter shall be entitled to apply for a writ of habeas corpus.”
Locke v. Inman (E.D. Mo. 2020). “Mo.Rev.Stat. § 632.435, State ex rel. Koster v.”
Harmon v. Tubbesing (E.D. Mo. 2020). “Mo. Rev. Stat. § 632.435 , State ex rel. Koster v.”
In the Matter of C.T. (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). “” Under section 632.435, “[a]ny person detained under this chapter shall be entitled to file for a writ of habeas corpus.”
Henderson v. Missouri Dep't of Mental Health (E.D. Mo. 2023). “He seeks release from release from confinement pursuant to Missouri Revised Statute § 632.435 arguing that he no longer suffers from a mental disease or defect.”
Henderson v. Sheppard (E.D. Mo. 2023). “He seeks release from release from confinement pursuant to Missouri Revised Statute § 632.435 arguing that he no longer suffers from a mental disease or defect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.