Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 632.435 (2026)

Habeas corpus

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  632.435.  Habeas corpus. — Any person detained under this chapter shall be entitled to apply for a writ of habeas corpus.

­­--------

(L. 1980 H.B. 1724)

CROSS REFERENCE:

Alcohol and drug abuse detention, right of application for writ of habeas corpus, 631.175

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: State v. McKee, 39 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. McKee, 39 S.W.3d 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 5× “1982, both set out, in relevant part, that the “provisions of [section 632.435, RSMo], ... apply to persons com *570 mitted [under § 552.”
In re C.T., 432 S.W.3d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “6 Section 632.435 authorizes a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”
State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster v. The Honorable Gary Oxenhandler, Circuit Judge of Callaway Cnty., & Judy Groner, Circuit Clerk Callaway Cnty. Circuit Court, 491 S.W.3d 576 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” Section 632.435 provides that “[a]ny person detained under this chapter shall be entitled to apply for a writ of habeas corpus.”
Locke v. Inman (E.D. Mo. 2020). · cites it 2× “Mo.Rev.Stat. § 632.435, State ex rel. Koster v.”
Harmon v. Tubbesing (E.D. Mo. 2020). · cites it 2× “Mo. Rev. Stat. § 632.435 , State ex rel. Koster v.”
In the Matter of C.T. (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” Under section 632.435, “[a]ny person detained under this chapter shall be entitled to file for a writ of habeas corpus.”
Henderson v. Missouri Dep't of Mental Health (E.D. Mo. 2023). “He seeks release from release from confinement pursuant to Missouri Revised Statute § 632.435 arguing that he no longer suffers from a mental disease or defect.”
Henderson v. Sheppard (E.D. Mo. 2023). “He seeks release from release from confinement pursuant to Missouri Revised Statute § 632.435 arguing that he no longer suffers from a mental disease or defect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.