Any city or village may, without petition or creating a street improvement district, grade, curb, gutter, and pave any portion of a street otherwise paved so as to make one continuous paved street, but the portion to be so improved shall not exceed two blocks, including intersections, or thirteen hundred and twenty-five feet, whichever is the lesser. Such city or village may also grade, curb, gutter, and pave any unpaved street or alley which intersects a paved street for a distance of not to exceed one block on either side of such paved street. The improvements authorized by this section may be performed upon any portion of a street or any unpaved street or alley not previously improved to meet or exceed the minimum standards for pavement set by the city or village for its paved streets.
Notes of Decisions
Turner v. City of North Platte, 279 N.W.2d 868 (Neb. 1979).
· cites it 8× “The special assessments were levied pursuant to Nebraska’s “gap and extend” law, sections 18-2001 to 18-2005, R. R. S. 1943.”
Iverson v. City of North Platte, 500 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 15× “She contended that the City exceeded its statutory authority to create gap paving districts under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 18-2001 et seq. (Reissue 1991) when it “stacked” multiple districts.”
Gaughen v. Sloup, 250 N.W.2d 915 (Neb. 1977).
· cites it 6× “*763 In 1963, the Legislature enacted sections 18-2001 to 18-2003, R. R. S. 1943.”
Hall v. Cnty. of Lancaster, 287 Neb. 969 (Neb. 2014).
“CONCLUSION We conclude that the improvement unit mandating the paving of one block of Donna Street, which intersected Jean Drive, was plainly authorized by the second sentence of § 18-2001. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the cause with direction to…”
Benesch v. City of Schuyler, 555 N.W.2d 63 (Neb. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 4× “INTRODUCTION George Robert Benesch appeals from the dismissal of his petition challenging a special assessment for street improvements levied pursuant to Nebraska’s “gap and extend” law, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 18-2001 to 18-2005 (Reissue 1991).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.