Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1087 (2026)
Order of appointment; special directions
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Every order appointing a receiver shall contain special directions in respect to his powers and duties, and upon application of any party to the suit, after due notice thereof, such further directions may be made in that behalf by the court or judge as may in the further progress of the cause become proper.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1949–2022 · leading case: Priesner v. Starry, 300 Neb. 81 (Neb. 2018).
Priesner v. Starry, 300 Neb. 81 (Neb. 2018). “" Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1087 (Reissue 2016), every order appointing a receiver must contain special directions with respect to the receiver's powers and duties and the court may give further directions as may become proper in the further progress of the cause.”
Seid v. Seid, 967 N.W.2d 253 (Neb. 2021). “626 Becker, 15 we stated that “a court’s ability to appoint a receiver is governed by statute. The court can appoint a receiver only in specific situations .”
Schreiber Bros. Hog Co. v. Schreiber, 312 Neb. 707 (Neb. 2022). “Motion for Further Directions After the receiver was appointed, Jerald filed a motion pur- suant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1087 (Reissue 2016) requesting that the district court enter an order providing further direc- tions to the receiver.”
Walker v. Walker, 854 F. Supp. 1443 (D. Neb. 1994). “Second, pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1087 (Reissue 1989), the receiver in this ease will be ordered: (a) to give a court-approved bond in the sum of $500,000 in accordance with Neb.”
Priesner v. Starry, 300 Neb. 81 (Neb. 2018). “” Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1087 (Reissue 2016), every order appointing a receiver must contain special direc- tions with respect to the receiver’s powers and duties and the court may give further directions as may become proper in the further progress of the cause.”
Frese v. Michalec, 36 N.W.2d 494 (Neb. 1949). “Pursuant to section 25-1087, R. S. 1943, every such order appointing a receiver should contain special directions in respect to his powers and duties.”
Sutton v. Killham (Neb. Ct. App. 2014). “Further, we note Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1087 (Reissue 2008), which permits any party to apply to the court for further directions to the receiver “as may in the further progress of the cause become proper.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.