Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1587.01 (2026)
Act, how cited
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.09 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: W. Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 938 N.W.2d 329 (Neb. 2020).
W. Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 938 N.W.2d 329 (Neb. 2020). “In 2013, Western Ethanol dissolved and distributed its assets to its members.”
Deuth v. Ratigan, 590 N.W.2d 366 (Neb. 1999). “Pursuant to the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (NUEFJA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
Friedman v. Friedman, 863 N.W.2d 153 (Neb. 2015). “Nebraska Advance Sheets 980 290 NEBRASKA REPORTS insufficiency of process, or insufficiency of services of proc ess, waives all such issues except as to the objection that the party is not amenable to process issued by a court of this state.”
Gem City Bone & Jt. v. Meister, 947 N.W.2d 302 (Neb. 2020). “MEISTER of Wyoming and that “the court lacked jurisdiction, such to offend the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.”
Walksalong v. MacKey, 549 N.W.2d 384 (Neb. 1996). “(Reissue 1989) (now codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1587.01 et seq. (Reissue 1995)).”
Lamb v. Lamb, 707 N.W.2d 423 (Neb. Ct. App. 2005). “Such a document makes it conceivable that the Wyoming order was registered under the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (UEFJA), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1587.01 et seq. (Reissue 1995), which perhaps explains the generation of the document by the Nebraska…”
St. Joseph Dev. Corp. v. Sequenzia, 585 N.W.2d 511 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). “(We note that the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act is now codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 through 25-1587.”
Ashton Optical Imports, Inc. v. Incite Int'l, Inc., 266 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Neb. 2003). “The Simpson case *1033 relied on by the defendants is inapposite. In Simpson, the plaintiff filed against the defendants in state court, an opinion was issued and the case remanded, and the plaintiff then filed an action against the same defendants for a § 1983 violation in…”
Penn Cal, L.L.C. v. Penn Cal Dairy, 646 N.W.2d 601 (Neb. 2002). “Pursuant to the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (UEFJA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
ODK Capital v. Paw Spa Pet Resort, No. A-24-945 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 13, 2026). “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
Anderson v. Werner Enter., Inc., 581 N.W.2d 104 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR On appeal, the defendants contend that the Douglas County District Court erred in failing to grant their motion to vacate the Montana judgment and release any liens on Werner’s property in Nebraska and that the Douglas County District Court erred in finding…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.