Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1587.01 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.09 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: W. Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 305 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
W. Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 305 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “In November 2010, pursuant to the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
Deuth v. Ratigan, 590 N.W.2d 366 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (NUEFJA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
Friedman v. Friedman, 290 Neb. 973 (Neb. 2015). · cites it 2× “Nebraska Advance Sheets 980 290 NEBRASKA REPORTS insufficiency of process, or insufficiency of services of proc­ ess, waives all such issues except as to the objection that the party is not amenable to process issued by a court of this state.”
Gem City Bone & Jt. v. Meister, 306 Neb. 710 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 4× “They claimed that Meister and his pro- fessional corporation lacked sufficient contacts with the State 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
Walksalong v. MacKey, 549 N.W.2d 384 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 2× “(Reissue 1989) (now codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1587.01 et seq. (Reissue 1995)).”
Lamb v. Lamb, 707 N.W.2d 423 (Neb. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Such a document makes it conceivable that the Wyoming order was registered under the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (UEFJA), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1587.01 et seq. (Reissue 1995), which perhaps explains the generation of the document by the Nebraska…”
St. Joseph Dev. Corp. v. Sequenzia, 585 N.W.2d 511 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “(We note that the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act is now codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 through 25-1587.”
Ashton Optical Imports, Inc. v. Incite Int'l, Inc., 266 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “The Simpson case *1033 relied on by the defendants is inapposite. In Simpson, the plaintiff filed against the defendants in state court, an opinion was issued and the case remanded, and the plaintiff then filed an action against the same defendants for a § 1983 violation in…”
Penn Cal, L.L.C. v. Penn Cal Dairy, 646 N.W.2d 601 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to the Nebraska Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (UEFJA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
ODK Capital v. Paw Spa Pet Resort (Neb. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1587.01 to 25-1587.”
Anderson v. Werner Enter., Inc., 581 N.W.2d 104 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR On appeal, the defendants contend that the Douglas County District Court erred in failing to grant their motion to vacate the Montana judgment and release any liens on Werner’s property in Nebraska and that the Douglas County District Court erred in finding…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.