Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-303 (2026)

Assignee; defenses and counterclaims available

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An action by the assignee of a thing in action shall be without prejudice to any counterclaim or defense existing between the original parties; but this section shall not apply to negotiable bonds, promissory notes, or bills of exchange, transferred in good faith, and upon good consideration before due.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1946–2017 · leading case: Hall v. State, 646 N.W.2d 572 (Neb. 2002).
Hall v. State, 646 N.W.2d 572 (Neb. 2002). “In these declaratory judgment actions, Hall made facial challenges to the constitutionality of Nebraska’s homicide statutes.”
Midwest Renewable Energy v. Am. Engr. Testing, 894 N.W.2d 221 (Neb. 2017). “, § 81; 46 Am. Jur. 2d, supra note 39, § 433.”
Archer v. Musick, 25 N.W.2d 908 (Neb. 1947). · cites it 2× “Van Etten, supra, insofar as they are in conflict with this opinion, should be overruled since they no longer correctly reflect the law of this state.”
Archer v. Musick, 23 N.W.2d 323 (Neb. 1946). · cites it 2× “In that connection it should be observed that section 25-303, R. S. 1943, specifically provides that “An action by the assignee of a thing in action shall be without prejudice to any counterclaim or defense existing between the original parties; * * * .”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-303(1): 1 case
Hall v. State, 646 N.W.2d 572 (Neb. 2002). “In these declaratory judgment actions, Hall made facial challenges to the constitutionality of Nebraska’s homicide statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.