Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1105 (2026)

Possession of gambling records; penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) A person commits the offense of possession of gambling records if, other than as a player, he or she knowingly possesses any writing, paper, instrument, or article which is:

(a) Of a kind commonly used in the operation or promotion of a bookmaking scheme or enterprise and such writing, paper, instrument, or article has been used for the purpose of recording, memorializing, or registering any bet, wager, or other gambling information; or

(b) Of a kind commonly used in the operation, promotion, or playing of a lottery or mutuel scheme or enterprise or other scheme not conducted pursuant to the Nebraska Bingo Act, the Nebraska County and City Lottery Act, the Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act, the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act, the Nebraska Small Lottery and Raffle Act, the State Lottery Act, the Nebraska Racetrack Gaming Act, or section 9-701 and such writing, paper, instrument, or article has been used for the purpose of recording, memorializing, or registering any bet, wager, or other gambling information not permitted by such acts or section.

(2) Possession of gambling records in the first degree is a Class II misdemeanor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1989 · leading case: State v. Texel, 433 N.W.2d 541 (Neb. 1989).
State v. Texel, 433 N.W.2d 541 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 4× “§ 28-1102 (Reissue 1985), and with one count of possessing gambling records in violation of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-1105 (Cum. Supp.1986).”
State v. Peters, 435 N.W.2d 675 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 3× “§ 28-1102 (Reissue 1985), and one count of violating Neb. Rev.Stat. § 28-1105 (Cum.Supp.1986).”
State v. Trahan, 428 N.W.2d 619 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “§ 28-1102 (Reissue 1985); and possession of gambling records, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1105 (Cum. Supp. 1986).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.